Indeed, human infections caused by these critters are also on the rise. The research finds these are growing at an "unprecedented rate" along the US Atlantic coast and also the coasts of Northern Europe.
"We were able to demonstrate that there was an increase in the numbers of vibrios, probably a two or threefold increase, correlated with the increase in climate temperature, and then correlated with outbreaks of vibrio infections that have been recorded in the medical records," said Rita Colwell, a microbiologist at the University of Maryland who is a co-author of the study, and who was also formerly administrator of the US National Science Foundation.
Colwell published the study along with researchers from the University of Genoa in Italy, the University of Plymouth in the UK, and other US and global institutions.
Vibrio are very simple organisms, but nonetheless capable of causing severe damage. Vibrio also come in many species - some are responsible for causing cholera. Another species, Vibrio vulnificus, was dubbed "highly lethal and is responsible for the overwhelming majority of reported seafood-related deaths in the United States" in a recent scientific paper.
This species of vibrio can not only poison us through food, but can cause deadly infections to people who swim with cuts or wounds, into which the bacteria can enter.
According to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, there are 80,000 cases of vibriosis in the US annually, the vast majority from consuming seafood. Vibrio also thrive in warmer sea waters, suggesting the risk is greater in the summer - which, of course, is when people are in the water or near beaches, consuming seafood.
The new study examined 133 samples of long-term marine plankton levels from across the North Atlantic region, and then analysed the vibrio content within them, in proportion to other bacteria levels. The samples dated back about a half century.
In eight out of nine regions of the North Atlantic, the study found that as temperatures warmed, numbers of vibrio bacteria also grew. Furthermore, it also showed a relationship between growing vibrio numbers and growing vibrio cases in humans, a relationship that was particularly pronounced during heat waves. "An increased Vibrio concentration in seawater as a result of ocean warming can be concluded to be linked with increased incidence of environmentally inquired infections," the study concludes.
When asked if growing numbers of vibrio are just one kind of deleterious changes to the ocean brought on by climate change - changes that, in turn, can harm us - Colwell responded, "The answer to that would be yes. It's a disruption of the natural pattern, and it will be selecting for a number of species, and that's the problem."
The prevalence of these bacteria has increased as the ocean has warmed, both as result of global warming and multi-decadal variations in ocean circulation
"What this new research does is present evidence of the increased prevalence of these bacteria over broad regions of the North Atlantic from preserved samples collected over 54 years," said marine ecologist Donald Boesch, president of the University of Maryland Centre for Environmental Science, who was not involved in the research.
"The prevalence of these bacteria has increased as the ocean has warmed, both as result of global warming and multi-decadal variations in ocean circulation. This trend may be caused by changes in the plankton community rather than just the temperature alone. In other words, increased prevalence may be an ecosystem-level effect of climate change."
"The relationship of these trends with the incidence of the human diseases reported caused by Vibrio species as reported in the paper is less-convincing, particularly because the long-term plankton monitoring was not conducted off the US coast," adds Boesch. "Nonetheless, there is ample other information on this relationship to counsel increased vigilance in protecting public health from these natural environmental pathogens in our warming world."
So in sum, it's more evidence supporting Jackson's point - we don't just damage the oceans even as we ourselves go unaffected by the consequences of that damage. Rather, from harm to fisheries to direct human health threats, that damage hurts us, too.
"I think the public would not expect that the oceans would have that direct impact on human health," said Colwell.