US Defence Secretary Jim Mattis has hinted about the existence of military options on North Korea that might spare Seoul from a brutal counterattack but declined to say what kind of options he was talking about or whether they involved the use of lethal force.
US Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley yesterday said that the UN Security Council had run out of options on containing North Korea's nuclear programme and indicated the US may need to turn the matter over to the Pentagon.
Any conflict on the Korean Peninsula could easily result in bloodshed unseen since the 1950-53 Korean War, which claimed the lives of more than 50,000 Americans and millions of Koreans and ended in an armed truce, not a peace treaty.
Seoul is within artillery range of North Korea, which not only has nuclear and conventional weapons but also is believed to have a sizeable chemical and biological arsenal.
Asked whether there were any military options the US could take with North Korea that would not put Seoul at grave risk, Mattis said: "Yes there are. But I will not go into details".