Democrat Tim Walz and Republican JD Vance face off in the US vice presidential debate.
Democrat Tim Walz and Republican JD Vance face off in the US vice presidential debate.
Democrat Tim Walz and Republican JD Vance have clashed at a US vice presidential debate that was surprisingly civil amid the final stretch of an ugly election campaign marred by inflammatory rhetoric and two assassination attempts.
The two rivals, who have forcefully attacked each other on the campaign trail, mostly struck a cordial tone on Tuesday, instead saving their fire for the candidates at the top of their tickets, Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris and Republican former president Donald Trump.
The most tense exchange occurred near the end of the debate, when Vance - who has said he would not have voted to certify the results of the 2020 election - avoided a question about whether he would challenge this year’s vote if Trump loses.
JD Vance gets angry at moderator for fact-checking him during the vice presidential debate:
Walz responded by blaming Trump’s false claims of voter fraud for instigating the January 6, 2021, mob that attacked the US Capitol in an unsuccessful effort to prevent the certification of Joe Biden’s 2020 election.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and US Vice-President Kamala Harris in their sit-down interview with CNN. Photo / CNN
“He is still saying he didn’t lose the election,” Walz said, before turning to Vance.
“Did he lose the 2020 election?”
Vance again sidestepped the question, instead accusing Harris of pursuing online censorship of opposing viewpoints.
Walz, 60, the liberal governor of Minnesota and a former high school teacher, and Vance, 40, a bestselling author and conservative firebrand US senator from Ohio, have portrayed themselves as two sons of America’s Midwestern heartland with deeply opposing views on the issues gripping the country.
The rivals each sought to land a lasting blow at the last remaining debate before the November 5 presidential election, arguing over the Middle East crisis, immigration, taxes, abortion, climate change and the economy.
But by and large the two men appeared intent on providing a demonstration of “Midwestern nice,” thanking each other even while they went after their respective running mates in the traditional attack-dog role for vice presidential candidates.
Former US President Donald Trump and Republican candidate for US Senate JD Vance greet supporters during the rally at the Dayton International Airport on November 7, 2022 in Vandalia, Ohio. Photo / Getty Images
Vance questioned why Harris had not done more to address inflation, immigration and the economy while serving in Biden’s administration, mounting a consistent attack line that Trump often failed to deliver while debating Harris last month.
“If Kamala Harris has such great plans for how to address middle-class problems, then she ought to do them now - not when asking for promotion, but in the job the American people gave her three-and-a-half years ago,” Vance said.
Walz described Trump as an unstable leader who had prioritised billionaires and turned Vance’s criticism on its head on the issue of immigration, attacking Trump for pressuring Republicans in Congress to abandon a bipartisan border security bill earlier in 2024.
“Most of us want to solve this,” Walz said of immigration.
“Donald Trump had four years to do this, and he promised you, Americans, how easy it will be.”
The night’s tone was a far cry from the divisiveness that has characterised the campaign. Trump has repeatedly denigrated Harris, including levelling racist and sexist attacks, and twice escaped attempts on his life. Walz had previously called his Republican opponents “weird,” and Vance came under fire for past comments disparaging some Democrats as “childless cat ladies”.
Trump, watching on television, was posting furiously during the debate, sometimes twice a minute, on his Truth Social site, attacking the CBS moderators and calling Walz “pathetic” and “low IQ”.
Political analysts say vice presidential debates generally do not alter the outcome of an election. That said, even a slight shift in public opinion could prove decisive with the race on a razor’s edge five weeks before Election Day.
Vance defended his running mate despite having criticised Trump ahead of the 2016 election.
“I was wrong about Donald Trump,” he said. “I was wrong, first of all, because I believe some of the media stories that turned out to be dishonest fabrications of his record. But most importantly, Donald Trump delivered for the American people.”
Harris was widely seen as the winner of her sole debate with Trump on September 10 in Philadelphia, which was far more chaotic than Tuesday’s affair.
That square-off did little to change the trajectory of an extremely close election battle. While Harris has edged ahead in national polls, most surveys show voters remain fairly evenly divided in the seven states that will decide the November election.
