Clinton issued a statement saying that she regretted using the word "half" to describe the Trump supporters she was referring to.
"That was wrong," Clinton said. "But let's be clear, what's really 'deplorable' is that Donald Trump hired a major advocate for the so-called 'alt-right' movement to run his campaign and that David Duke and other white supremacists see him as a champion of their values." Clinton blasted Trump specifically for his feud with the family of a Muslim American Army officer who died in Iraq, his attacks against a Hispanic federal judge hearing two cases against him and his prominent role in the "birther" movement promoting the idea that Obama was not born in the United States.
In her remarks at the fundraiser, Clinton also called for empathy for the other "half" of Trump's supporters.
"That other basket of people are people who feel that the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures, and they're just desperate for change," Clinton said. "It doesn't really even matter where it comes from. Those are people we have to understand and empathise with as well."
A new Washington Post poll shows Clinton with a 46 per cent to 41 percent edge over Trump among likely voters. Clinton's lead swells to 10 percentage points among the wider swath of registered voters, 45 per cent to 35 per cent, similar to her 45 per cent to 37 per cent edge last month.
Let's spare the phony outrage
Hillary Clinton should not have described "half" of Donald Trump's supporters as deplorable. People have all kinds of reasons for supporting their candidate.
But if there is one group of people who should take their outrage about Clinton's comments and stuff it in a very dark place, it's Trump and his paid apologists.
Every reporter and commentator closely following this race knows Trump's campaign is fuelled, at least to some degree, by tacit or even overt appeals to bigotry or efforts to encourage a sense among many Trump backers that white identity and white America are under siege. Poll after poll has shown that majorities or pluralities of Republican voters support Trump's proposed temporary ban on Muslims from entering the US and mass deportations.
This flap leads us back into the question at the heart of Trumpism. Are Trump's appeals resonating because of many voters' own bigotry? Or is their susceptibility to bigoted appeals rooted in legitimate economic and cultural grievances?
Clinton should not have overgeneralised and called all these voters "deplorables". But the underlying argument that Trump is running a bigoted campaign that tries to prey on legitimate grievances and bigotry alike by scapegoating minority groups is inarguable.