But scientists emphasise that conservation works when done correctly, and the study calls on governments to adopt measures such as setting science-based limits on how many sharks and rays fishermen can catch and keep.
"Action is needed immediately," the authors wrote.
Sharks and rays are taken for their meat, fins, gill plates and liver oil. They are also frequently caught incidentally by fishermen using nets or long lines with thousands of baited hooks to attract tuna or swordfish. Such incidental catch is not the main goal, but often it is welcome when it happens.
That is one reason sharks are especially vulnerable, scientists say. Even if commercial shark fishing stops being viable because of declining numbers, incidental catches could continue to drive down numbers.
But high levels of incidental catch are not inevitable, said Sonja Fordham, an author of the study and the president of Shark Advocates International, a nonprofit group dedicated to shark conservation.
"We have volumes of scientific studies now about how you might avoid catching sharks to begin with, and certainly a lot about the best practices for releasing the shark safely and making sure it survives," Fordham said. It matters, for example, how long a shark struggles on the line, so fishermen should monitor their lines regularly. They should avoid shark hot spots and use shark-friendly gear that allows the creatures to break free while keeping tuna and swordfish on the line.
Many fishermen are not taking these measures because they often have financial incentives to keep the sharks, she said. Governments often allow fishermen to keep them, even as populations plummet. For example, while shortfin mako sharks are classified as globally endangered, the United States, the European Union and many other governments still allow fishing of the species.
For the study, scientists scoured the world for all available data on each species, combining figures from fisheries and scientific surveys with information on reproduction rates, which tend to be slow. Scientists already knew that sharks were in trouble, but there was no comparable global analysis. At a workshop in 2018, as the authors gathered to review each species' data, they watched as one catastrophic decline after another popped up on a screen. A grim silence filled the room, Pacoureau recalled. He himself felt shocked at the magnitude of the declines and hopes that their work will help save sharks.
"The advance here is the very elegant statistical analysis that puts it all together and puts a very firm, very well-justified number on it," said Demian Chapman, a marine biologist and professor at Florida International University who researches sharks and was not involved in the study. "It really helps for communicating the scope of the problem to policymakers. It's a number they can grasp very easily and realize how bad it is."
Since these sharks and rays range across the open ocean, oblivious to national borders, reversing these declines will require international cooperation. A global movement to conserve 30 per cent of the planet's land and oceans by 2030 is gaining traction, but Fordham said for such commitments to help sharks, conservationists and scientists would have to do a better job of participating in fisheries meetings.
"We have this problematic disconnect between fisheries and environment agencies, I would say in just about every country in the world," Fordham said. "They're making promises in one arena that are not being fulfilled in another."
Written by: Catrin Einhorn
© 2021 THE NEW YORK TIMES
