Democrats spent the weekend pushing back against the claim by President Donald Trump and some Republicans that corruption has poisoned the investigation led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller into possible coordination between Trump associates and the Kremlin during the 2016 election.
Democrats and some Republicans worry that this view, buttressed by the GOP memo, will lead Trump to fire Mueller or Deputy Attorney-General Rod Rosenstein, who oversees the Russia probe.
Calling on Trump not to interfere in Mueller's investigation, four Republican members of the House Intelligence Committee dismissed today the idea that the memo's criticism of how the FBI handled certain surveillance applications undermines the Special Counsel's work. Representatives Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, Chris Stewart of Utah, Will Hurd of Texas and Brad Wenstrup of Ohio represented the committee on the morning political talk shows.
Gowdy, who helped draft the memo, said Trump should not fire Rosenstein and rejected the idea that the document has bearing on the investigation.
"I actually don't think it has any impact on the Russia probe," Gowdy, who also chairs the House Oversight Committee, said on CBS.
Stewart, arguing that the two are "very separate" issues, said Mueller should be allowed to finish his work. "This memo, frankly, has nothing at all to do with the Special Counsel," he told Fox News.
The four Republicans walked a careful line on the GOP document, which alleges that the Justice Department abused its powers by obtaining a warrant for surveillance of former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page using information from a source who was biased against Trump.
Their comments echoed those of Speaker Paul Ryan, who supported the memo's release but insists its findings do not impugn Mueller or Rosenstein.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., whose actions have been at the centre of the debate over the memo, did not participate in interviews.
It remained unclear whether Trump would use the document as a pretext to fire senior Justice Department officials, a decision that could trigger a constitutional crisis, according to Democrats. Trump had advocated the memo's release, telling advisers it could help him, in part by undercutting Mueller's investigation and opening the door to firings.
Trump tweeted yesterday that while "the Russian Witch Hunt goes on and on," the Republican memo "totally vindicates" him.
"Their (sic) was no Collusion and there was no Obstruction (the word now used because, after one year of looking endlessly and finding NOTHING, collusion is dead). This is an American disgrace!" he wrote from Florida, where he spent the weekend.
The four-page GOP memo accused current and former senior Justice Department officials of omitting key facts about former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, the source of some of their information, in applications to carry out surveillance on Page. Steele wrote the dossier alleging ties between Trump and Kremlin officials; his research was paid for by Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee.
Republicans say this funding stream should have been disclosed in the surveillance applications, which they argue would not have been approved without the information contained in the dossier. Democrats take issue with both points.
Nunes said at the weekend that Justice "got a warrant on someone in the Trump campaign using opposition research paid for by the Democratic Party and the Hillary Clinton campaign".
"That's what this is about," he told Fox News. "And it's wrong. And it should never be done."
If the House Intelligence Committee approves the release of the Democratic memo, it is expected to go to the Justice Department for redactions. Even if the motion succeeds, Trump has five days to block it.
As today's back-and-forth set the stage for more heated debate in the coming week, Republicans faced questions over whether Trump might fire Mueller or Rosenstein.
Reince Priebus, the former White House chief of staff, said that he "never felt that the president was going to fire the special counsel," disputing a report in the Washington Post that he was "incredibly concerned" Trump was moving to fire Mueller last northern summer.
"I never heard that," Priebus said on NBC. Pressed on whether he was aware of the President's views on the issue, Priebus said Trump was "clear" about what he saw as Mueller's conflicts of interest in the job and allowed that others may have "interpreted that" as Trump's desire to fire Mueller.
Former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci told the ABC that he would urge Trump not to fire Rosenstein.
"I would tell the President, if I was in his presence, 'Do not fire him (Rosenstein)," he said. "He'll be fair and impartial. You may be upset about the politicisation of what happened, but I don't think it came from him. Give him a chance to sort this out with the rest of the department.' "
Scaramucci also said he hopes Trump decides not to testify before Mueller in the probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election.
"I actually don't want him to testify because as a lawyer, I don't want him caught in a 'gotcha' moment where someone accuses him of lying, where he may not remember something ... I would say, 'Sir, there's no reason to testify. Let the thing unfold the way it is.'
