Facebook hoped the raw immediacy of livestreaming might coax users to share more about their lives. On Thursday, a woman in the passenger seat of the car where Philando Castile lay dying, shot by a Minnesota cop during a traffic stop, used Facebook Live to show the world the gory aftermath.
When the social media giant introduced Facebook Live, it probably expected safe viral moments such as Chewbacca Mum or the Buzzfeed watermelon explosion. But it found livestreaming is a lot more than that. Like real life, livestreaming can have a light side and a dark side. It has a long history of use as a powerful medium for accountability, which is what Diamond Reynolds achieved.
Her video disappeared from Facebook that night, then reappeared with a warning of graphic content. Facebook later said the video was temporarily taken down because of a "technical glitch", without explaining further. But the sudden loss of access raises questions about whether Facebook is ready to judge which raw, visceral moments its users broadcast may stay on the site, and which will go.
Throw in Facebook's long history of cultivating a feeling of safety within its blue-and-white virtual walls through unpredictable moderation and aggressive content policies, and the complications of Facebook's new commitment to livestreaming become clear.
No matter how much Mark Zuckerberg chews on the word "raw", it will never be fully macerated in the maw of Silicon Valley buzzwords. "Raw" can mean a mother in her car, delighted by an impulse buy at Kohl's. It can also mean a man dying in his car as a police officer swears while pointing a gun at his body, or a broadcast suicide or rape, seemingly for the sake of getting "likes".