Mexico also commits to immediate(ly) (UNREADABLE) domestic laws and regulations with a view to identifying any changes that (UNREADABLE) to bring into force and implement such an agreement.
If the United States determines, at its discretion and after consultation with Mexico, after 45 calendar days from the date of the issuance of the Join Declaration, that the measures adopted by the Government of Mexico pursuant to the Joint Declaration have not sufficiently achieved results in addressing the flow of migrants to the southern border of the United States, the Government of Mexico will take all necessary steps under the domestic law to bring the agreement into force with a view to ensuring that the agreement will enter into force within 45 days.
Signed on this 7th of June, 2019 in Washington, D.C. by:
(SIGNATURE 1) (SIGNATURE 2)
-
A few observations:
1) The first question is obviously whether the document is legitimate. It is signed by two people, that we can see, with the one on the left apparently being an American signatory and the one on the right being a Mexican one. Neither of these signatures is from the countries' respective presidents, top diplomats or ambassadors to the other country. (There could be other signatures that aren't in view, along with the text of each names. The document appears to be folded in thirds, and the signatures appear to come before the fold that is two-thirds of the way through the document.)
2) The paper clearly deals with some kind of "burden-sharing," apparently with regard to "refugees." The prevailing wisdom is that Trump may have been referring to some kind of deal involving asylum rules, possibly a "safe third country agreement" in which Central Americans seeking asylum in the United States would be held in Mexico while their claims are processed (a controversial topic in Mexico). The Washington Post doesn't generally refer to asylum seekers as "refugees," but the concept is similar, so that makes some sense.
3) It's not clear from the text what the agreement might entail beyond that - or if all the details have even been sorted out. The second paragraph sounds like standard language indicating that Mexico must determine which laws or regulations must be changed. The third paragraph suggests that this is something the United States can trigger after 45 days and that it would be up to the Mexican government to put it into effect in the next 45 days. This all tracks with Trump's tweet suggesting the Mexican legislature would need to be consulted, which would make sense if this has to do with asylum rules.
4) The big question is what's in the first visible paragraph that we can't see, and what might come before it. It seems unlikely, given there is only one-third of a sheet of paper above that first visible paragraph, that there are extensive guidelines for what the deal entails. But there appears to be enough of an agreement that Mexico would immediately be put in the position of trying to implement it, rather than engage in further negotiations.
