COMMENT: "No rescue like this, and on this scale, has been attempted in human history," said Richard Lloyd Parry in The Times.
If he means no rescue of 12 boys and a man trapped in an underground cave tunnel system in Thailand has been attempted, then he's absolutely right. The grandeur of this achievement has been equalled only by the extremes of hyperbole used to wring even more drama from an event that already had more than enough of it.
The complexity of the task, the ingenuity brought to bear on its solution, the bravery of the rescuers – especially after one of their number died before the operation even began – and the courage of the rescued all deserve the highest praise. Nothing could possibly diminish it.
But why does it have to made into a competition? Is it really more impressive than past rescues, such as the evacuation of 338,000 soldiers from Dunkirk in one week of World War II by a flotilla including hundreds of civilian volunteers? Is it greater than Ernest Shackleton's epic voyage to rescue his stranded crew from Elephant Island? More importantly, does it matter whether it is or not?
Thanks to technology, the Tham Luang rescue is more "real" to us than these other events.