The Syria crisis is only the latest example of how Obama's foreign policy is still drawn to the Middle East. Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel was in Asia last month when Washington was drawn to the brink of military intervention before Syria agreed to give up its chemical weapons arsenal, diverting Hagel's attention.
The situation works for China, which is rapidly modernising its armed forces and boosting its regional influence. Xi has been visiting Indonesia and Malaysia this week to improve Beijing's reputation at a time when its aggressive stance on territorial issues has strained ties with some countries in southeast Asia. Washington's acute political paralysis gives Xi a freer hand to become the big presence in the room.
"It shows that China has a functional government and America doesn't at the moment," said Kerry Brown, a China expert at the University of Sydney in Australia. "It's just another sign that America is kind of losing its luster, losing its status."
In announcing Obama's decision Thursday, White House press secretary Jay Carney said the government shutdown is "setting back our ability to create jobs through promotion of US exports and advance US leadership and interests in the largest emerging region in the world."
Even so, he said, Obama is committed "to the rebalancing of our policy" toward the Asia-Pacific and looks forward to going at another time. Obama has made five trips to Asia as president.
In Indonesia earlier this week, lawmakers applauded after Xi became the first foreign leader to address Parliament - this in a country where Obama lived as a child. Xi's call for greater cooperation began with an informal greeting in the local Bahasa Indonesian language - a rare display of oratorical skill for a Chinese leader.
Then Xi went to Malaysia, where he and his wife met Prime Minister Najib Razak and received a ceremonial welcome at Parliament on Friday that included a military honour guard and 21-gun salute.
In Indonesia, Xi signed deals worth billions of dollars, while in Malaysia, he agreed to boost military cooperation and training to fight transnational crime and terrorism.
Experts in Asia said Obama's no-show weakens US leadership globally.
"If they can furlough jobs, cease government services and risk a downgrade in the country's credit rating, American politicians may start finding it tough to be consistent in their political reassurances about US commitment toward faraway Asia," wrote Simon Tay, chairman of the Singapore Institute of International Affairs.
Retired US Adm. Dennis Blair, a former head of US Pacific Command, played down the impact of Obama's cancellation and said the visit could wait until Obama can give the region his full attention.
"The United States has been here in this region in a major economic, diplomatic, military and influential way ever since 1944 and that situation has not changed," he said.
Still, the cancellation has been particularly disappointing to Southeast Asian nations that look to the US as a counterweight in their disputes with China over the South China Sea. The Philippines, for example, has turned to the US to build up its ill-equipped defence forces during this time of acrimonious rifts with China in disputed waters.
Hagel and his predecessor, Leon Panetta, have made frequent visits to the Asia-Pacific region since 2011 in a signal of the importance of the military dimensions of the Obama administration's Asia ambitions.
The most visible sign of Washington's military shift toward Asia and the Pacific may be the rotational deployment of about 250 Marines to northern Australia. The Pentagon also is arranging more exercises with partners in the region and has deployed the USS Freedom, the first in a new class of smaller combat vessels, to Singapore.
It also is shoring up relations with long-time allies such as Thailand while exploring deeper ties to old enemies like Vietnam, and has opened negotiations with the Philippines to increase the US military presence there.
Still, the refocus to Asia seems more sluggish than was envisioned.
"The administration has found themselves in a rhetorical box; they have committed themselves to a rebalancing, or a pivot, without fully understanding what they would have to do to make a material difference in America's position," said Michael Auslin, director of Japan studies at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington.
- AP