The Wildlife Conservation Society said it was concerned about the multiple threats to giraffes that have already resulted in population decline, citing habitat loss, droughts worsened by climate change and the illegal killings and trade in giraffe body parts.
A key African conservationist said the move could help reverse declines in giraffe populations, as the move would help better track numbers of giraffes. "The giraffe has experienced over 40 per cent decline in the last 30 years," said Maina Philip Muruthi of the African Wildlife Foundation. "If that trend continues, it means that we are headed toward extinction."
Still, not all African countries supported the move.
"We see no reason as to why we should support this decision, because Tanzania has a stable and increasing population of giraffes," said Maurus Msuha, director of wildlife at the Tanzanian Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism. "Over 50 per cent of our giraffe population is within the Serengeti ecosystem, which is well protected. Why should we then go for this?"
Cites says the population of wild giraffes is actually much smaller than that of wild African elephants.
"We're talking about a few tens of thousands of giraffes and we're talking about a few hundreds of thousands of African elephants," said Tom De Meulenaar, chief of scientific services at Cites. He said the intention was to address the international trade in giraffes and their parts.
"With fewer giraffes than elephants in Africa, it was a no-brainer to simply regulate giraffe exports," said Tanya Sanerib, international legal director at the Centre for Biological Diversity.
The United States is the world's biggest consumer of giraffe products, conservationists said.
"It's still urgent for the Trump Administration to protect these imperilled animals under the US Endangered Species Act," Sanerib said.
President Donald Trump's Administration last week announced plans to water down the US Endangered Species Act.
- AP