MPs to have a go at laws on monarchy

Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles at Windsor Castle make their first public appearance together since they announced their engagement. Picture / Reuters

Legislation required to enact the marriage of Prince Charles to Camilla Parker Bowles will be seized upon by British MPs determined to question the future role of the monarchy.

A Bill settling the new constitutional arrangement is expected to be debated in Parliament to give the couple's wedding on April 8 full legal status.

Although pro-republican MPs say they do not intend to oppose the marriage, they will want to use any debate on the constitution to bring public scrutiny to the rising costs of the royal family.

MPs may press for amendments to the bill that could include proposals for reducing the Civil List, the taxpayers' contribution to maintaining the Queen and her family. Others may want to see a new constitutional settlement that gives women and non-Anglicans equal rights to the throne. The marriage has been approved by the Queen as required by the Royal Marriages Act, which gives the monarch power of veto over the marriage choices of senior members of the royal family.

House of Commons sources said yesterday that without legislation Parker Bowles may inadvertently benefit from the complex Civil List provisions. Earlier this week it emerged that Prince Charles, 56, paid himself 11.9 million ($31.3 million) last year out of his private wealth, the historic estates of the Duchy of Cornwall.

Parker Bowles, 57, receives a personal allowance of 130,000 ($342,000) a year from the Duchy to cover her living costs.

But her claim on Prince Charles's vast wealth will have already been settled by what one lawyer described yesterday "as one of the biggest pre-nuptial contracts" ever signed.

Prince Charles will remember the protracted 17 million ($44.7 million) divorce settlement he agreed with Princess Diana's lawyers.

The couple's lawyers will have also redrawn both their wills to take account of the new constitutional position.

Part of the new arrangements will consider a 2 million ($5.25 million) life insurance policy on which Mrs Parker Bowles is the sole beneficiary. Under the terms of this insurance trust set up by Prince Charles, Parker Bowles is provided with an income of around 150,000 ($394,240) a year. She cannot get at the capital which, at her death, would revert to Charles's sons William and Harry.

After her marriage Parker Bowles will become the most senior female royal behind the Queen. But she will not be known as the Princess of Wales, a title which for many people still conjures up memories of the late Diana, Princess of Wales.

The new bill will give Parker Bowles the title HRH Duchess of Cornwall which grants her precedence within the royal family as the wife of the Prince of Wales and heir to the throne. She will have no constitutional role but will be invited to state and national occasions.

If Charles becomes King, she will be known as Princess Consort, a title similar to the one last commonly used by Queen Victoria to describe her beloved Prince Albert.

The announcement could have been secured only with the combined support of the Queen, Prime Minister and the Archbishop of Canterbury.

Of these three estates it was the Church which represented the biggest obstacle. For the Church of England remarriage after divorce is a vexed question and as King, Charles would become the Anglican Church's Supreme Governor. A breakthrough came in July 2002 when, in an historic vote, the General Synod cleared the way for divorcees to marry in church.

The Church's governing body recognised there were exceptional circumstances in which a divorced person may be married in church during the lifetime of a former spouse. But continued resistance among senior Church of England bishops may explain why the couple, who have known each other for 30 years, are not having a church wedding but instead plan to be married in a civil service at Windsor Castle.

- Independent