The skyscraper - as a combination of commerce, engineering, architectural prowess and living - is arguably the defining symbol of modern life.
But it was the vast systems that make them work that first intrigued Ascher. "I was interested in how the systems in a building connect in a particular place - a building - as opposed to all these far-flung systems [of a city]."
It took her about a year to talk to experts and work out how to articulate the myriad systems that make up the skyscraper. Although Ascher concentrates on the basic framework for a "typical" skyscraper - there are obviously constant changes in the limits of what giant buildings can do - the study also covers specific examples of innovation from the bullet-shaped, counterweighted lifts in Taipei 101, which rise at 915m per minute (or 55km/h); to the window-washing booms that had to be custom-built to navigate the curved geometry of the Petronas Towers.
Ascher found time to write The Heights because of the US property market's collapse. Three years later, a number of towers that were commissioned during the peak years, such as the Shard in London, are nearing completion.
"Those really tall building are always started in the middle of a bubble because everybody is so excited, they think that the world is unlimited and we can just build tall and land prices are going to continue to go up," she says.
"They all take so long that, very often, by the time they're started the real estate market has turned and you're left with not quite a white elephant, but something along those lines." Is that how it is for the Shard, described as "a physical demonstration of the completely disproportionate distribution of resources and potential in our society" by a critic?
Ascher suggests its ascent during troubled times will be quickly forgotten, much like the world's most famous building, the Empire State, built in 1931 during the Great Depression.
"In five years no one's going to be saying that about the Shard," says Ascher, "it's just going to be a nice building and everyone will look at it and say 'isn't that interesting?'
The materials and demands put upon skyscrapers mean they won't last forever - despite the innovations outlined in the book.
But, as a defining symbol of the 20th and 21st centuries, it's fair to suggest that these buildings are our own societal monuments.
"People have always liked tall things," Ascher says. "We still keep the pyramids around, we still keep the gothic cathedrals around. While the skyscrapers aren't built to last anywhere near as long, I think as long as people like cities and coming together they will remain a representation of what people have always liked - height as power, height as statement."
- Independent