By PETER POPHAM
ISLAMABAD - If the United States follows through with the rhetoric and commits ground troops to Afghanistan, one day soon American troops will come face to face with the Taleban- the monster they helped to create.
This may, as we are told, be a war between civilisation and fanaticism. But in a quiet corner of the brains of those busy committing the United States to another world war, one hopes there will be recognition of the fact that the Taleban are in an important sense the creation of America.
Without America's hubristic determination to rule the world without having to pay the price that all prior empires paid in human life, this enemy would not have sprung up to challenge them.
The story goes back 22 years, to 1979. America had decided, post Vietnam War, that American deaths were an unacceptable price to pay for victory (let alone defeat) in far away countries of which they knew little.
But in 1979 this was still a bipolar world. The Soviet Union was already ailing, in far worse shape than anyone imagined, but around the world the proxy struggles between the superpowers went on: in the Middle East, in Angola, Ethiopia, South Yemen.
In Afghanistan a communist government was in power, propped up by the Russians. But Moscow's trusted puppet, Muhammad Daoud, cousin of the ousted King Zahir Shah and sometimes called the "Red Prince", had gone, murdered along with most of his family in a military coup.
Moscow was much less sure about Daoud's replacement, President Nur Muhammad Taraki, because Afghanistan was at best a very rum sort of communist state.
In Kabul the apparatchiks wore suits and their wives wore skirts and heels and even went to work. But the secular, atheistic fabric of the state was flimsy and fragile. A little way out in the rugged countryside, it remained rigidly tribal; women wore the burqa, Islamic piety was universal, and Russia was Satan.
Nudged and funded by the CIA, Iran and Pakistan, the tribal leaders began to cause trouble.
Moscow under Brezhnev, fat and autocratic and often drunk, decided enough was enough and sent in the army. The Soviet invasion and occupation of Afghanistan was under way. It was a rash adventure from the start, and the anti-Soviet hawk in President Jimmy Carter's cabinet, his National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, persuaded Carter that it offered the perfect opportunity to give Russia far more trouble than they had bargained for.
Building on a modest programme of assistance that had started six months before the Soviet invasion, Brzezinski got Carter to sign a secret directive to send covert aid to the Mujahedeen, the tribal Islamic warriors who were then in the earliest stages of giving the Russians hell. The Afghan Civil War was under way, and America was in it from the start - or even before the start, if Brzezinski himself is to be believed.
"We didn't push the Russians to intervene," he told an interviewer in 1998, "but we consciously increased the probability that they would do so. This secret operation was an excellent idea. Its effect was to draw the Russians into the Afghan trap. You want me to regret that?"
The long-term effect of the American intervention from cold-warrior Brzezinski's perspective was 10 years later to bring the Soviet Union to its knees. But there were other effects, too. To keep the war going, the CIA, in cahoots with Saudi Arabia and Pakistan's military intelligence agency ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate), funnelled millions and millions of dollars to the Mujahedeen.
It was the remotest and the safest form of warfare: the US (and Saudi Arabia) provided funds, and America also a very limited amount of training. They provided the Stinger missiles that ultimately changed the face of the war. Pakistan's ISI did everything else: training, equipping, motivating, advising. And they did the job with panache: Pakistan's then military ruler, General Zia ul Haq, who himself had strong fundamentalist leanings, threw himself into the task with a passion.
But in the process, as veteran journalist John Cooley puts it, the US indirectly "hatched a monster of Islamist extremism, the Taleban movement."
By 1989 the Mujahedeen had put the Russians to flight. But then they themselves, representing the whole ethnic spectrum of the country, from Pashtuns in the south and east to Tajiks and Uzbeks in the north and mongoloid Hazaras in the middle, just carried on fighting for supremacy.
The long civil war had also produced millions of refugees, more than three million of whom ended up in Pakistan. And it was in their squalid camps that Pakistan alighted accidentally on the civil war's appalling resolution: a militia sprung up from the thousands of Islamic seminaries or madrassas that opened in Pakistan during the civil war to give a rigid Islamic education to the young refugees -- a militia composed of youths who had been born or at least raised in exile, who knew nothing and cared less about the rich traditions of traditional, tribal Afghanistan, or about the patterns of give and take that held this mosaic-like country together.
They were deracinated, ruthless, they had nothing at all to lose; all they had, all they held to tightly, was a fiery belief in the most reductive, regressive form of Islam ever practised anywhere.
And America, now bent, perhaps, on destroying them, was in at the creation.
- INDEPENDENT
Full coverage: Terror in America
Pictures: Day 1 | Day 2
Brooklyn Bridge live webcam
Video
The fatal flights
Emergency telephone numbers for friends and family of victims and survivors
United Airlines: 0168 1800 932 8555
American Airlines: 0168 1800 245 0999
NZ Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade: 0800 872 111
US Embassy in Wellington (recorded info): 04 472 2068
Victims and survivors
Air New Zealand announcements
Air NZ flight information: 0800 737 000
How to donate to firefighters' fund
<i>Dialogue:</i> How the CIA created the monster in Afghanistan
AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.