It would be foolish to think that the execution of Troy Davis in Georgia on Wednesday local time would be enough to prompt a change of heart in the US legal system regarding the death penalty.
The tide of public opinion is slowly turning against state-sanctioned killing - independent research shows a decline from 80 to 62 per cent support since the early 1990s - but lawmakers and judges show no sign of moving.
The US Supreme Court, which devoted 23 words - less than a 140-character tweet, as the New York Times remarked - to rejecting Davis' bid for a stay of execution, has a conservative majority and has generally supported the death penalty since it reinstated it in 1976.
The Davis case should excite particular outrage against the ultimate penalty because of the doubts that swirled around his conviction for the 1989 killing of an off-duty police officer in Savannah. Not a shred of physical evidence connected Davis to the crime and seven of nine eyewitnesses against him have recanted their testimony
High-profile figures came to his support, including the Pope and former President Jimmy Carter, the latter saying that the doubt surrounding Davis' conviction called the entire death-penalty system into question. But the death penalty is repugnant even without the uncertainty that plainly attends on Davis' guilt.