They also were asked their opinion about whether then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton or the State Department contributed to the attack on the facilities in Benghazi, or the ability of the Government to respond.
The questionnaire is the first phase in trying to seat a jury for the trial of Ahmed Abu Khattala, 46, who has pleaded not guilty to all charges of conspiring in the attacks on September 11 and 12, 2012, that killed US Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans: Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.
Abu Khattala is the first terrorism suspect to face trial in a civilian US courtroom after being captured in a raid overseas and interrogated aboard a US warship.
US District Judge Christopher "Casey" Cooper approved the questionnaire from a list of proposed questions jointly submitted by Abu Khattala's lawyers and federal prosecutors.
"You have probably figured out that this is not an ordinary, run-of-the-mill trial," Cooper told 125 District residents who received the form. "There are no right answers, or wrong answers. There are only honest answers," Cooper instructed.
In-person jury selection begins next week when lawyers for each side will be able to ask members of the jury pool about their written responses before a trial that is projected to last six weeks, with opening statements set for September 26.
Cooper eliminated nine queries that one side or the other had disputed, including a question about whether a potential juror or a parent or spouse of that potential juror, was born outside the United States.
Lengthy juror surveys have become a feature of terrorism and other major federal trials, designed to elicit specific biographical facts and sensitive opinions to find jurors who have no bias towards either side, and who can keep an open mind and follow court instructions.
Experts say written forms filled out privately over days procure far more insights than can be learned by talking in person.
The challenges in seating a jury are especially high in heavily publicised cases such as Abu Khattala's, and in a national security-related trial in the nation's capital, where many potential jurors may have firsthand work or personal experience with Benghazi and with the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks - which included a strike at the Pentagon - or with the US response to terrorism in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.
There are no right answers, or wrong answers. There are only honest answers
The Abu Khattala questionnaire probes subtly and pointedly where respondents stand on that collection of topics, including asking indirectly about the political vitriol over Benghazi in last year's presidential contest.
Jury candidates are asked whether they watched or listened to any congressional hearings, including Clinton's 2015 appearance before a House select committee; read any books, reports or scholarly articles specifically related to the attacks; or have seen any related movies, videos or documentaries.
The questionnaire also asks jurors whether anyone in their family was killed or injured in a terrorist act or in the US military since 2001 in the Middle East or Africa; whether they served or planned to work in any capacity there; whether they or a close associate has ever worked as Pentagon, State Department, CIA or another US intelligence entity's employee or contractor; or participated in a terrorism-related rescue, support activity or investigation.
Other questions delve into respondents' and their close associates' familiarity and experience in fields such as the law, criminal justice, national security, counterterrorism, religion, international studies, media, military history, or Islamic or Middle Eastern studies.
