3) Who threatened Daniels? How? When?
"My client was physically threatened to stay silent about what she knew about Donald Trump," Avenatti said on CNN last week. If Daniels can demonstrate that she was threatened before signing the nondisclosure agreement in October 2016, then she might have a better shot at voiding the contract. And the source of the alleged threat, regardless of timing, will dictate how profusely Trump should be concerned. Are we talking about someone connected to the President or a bunch of online trolls?
4) What's the story behind the US$130,000 payoff?
Trump lawyer Michael Cohen says he used his own funds to pay Daniels to sign the nondisclosure agreement. The White House has declined to say whether Trump reimbursed Cohen - or knew about the payment. Avenatti said on MSNBC, without offering evidence, that Trump did know.
5) What is Daniels's endgame?
It is not clear why Daniels has chosen to speak publicly or what she hopes to accomplish. In court documents and in In Touch, she describes a consensual affair. She said on Twitter that she has "never claimed to be a victim" and said she is not being paid to tell her story. The closest thing to a stated motive is in Daniels's lawsuit, which notes that after the infamous Access Hollywood tape in 2016, "several women came forward publicly to tell their personal stories about their sexual encounters with Mr Trump. Around this time, Ms Clifford likewise sought to share details surrounding her relationship and encounters with Mr Trump with various media outlets." Daniels ultimately signed the agreement but the Wall Street Journal reported its existence in January. It could be that she didn't really choose to speak publicly but felt compelled to talk, since a version of her story was in the open.