Usually road rage is triggered by a specific event.
These events will often involve the actions of another driver, such as a slow driver, a driver changing lanes without indicating, or other behaviours that we interpret as a threat or an obstacle.
Our response to these specific triggers are influenced by a range of factors.
This includes person-related factors such as age, gender, beliefs, or mood and contextual stressors such as heavy traffic, time pressures, road works, or hot temperatures.
Our response is also affected by interpretations of the incident.
For example, personalising ('they cut me off on purpose!'), catastrophising ('you could have killed me!'), overgeneralising ('people are hopeless drivers!'), and standard violations ('people should watch where they're going').
Other factors include anonymity we feel in the car, or the inability to communicate in another way.
In fact, a range of behaviours stem from driving when angry, including everything from honking the horn, yelling abuse and demonstrating hostile gestures, through to tailgating or dangerous manoeuvres on the road, and ultimately getting out of the car to carry out verbal attacks or physical violence.
A recent study confirmed the link between 'driving anger' and certain aggressive and risky behaviours when it found anger while driving significantly predicted aggressive driving, risky driving, driving errors, as well as number of accidents.
And it's not a new phenomenon. The idea that generally decent people become full of anger and rage when they hop into a car has been with us since the advent of cars themselves.
Worryingly, an Australian study of 220 licensed drivers found that along with driving anger, the driver's bias towards their own illusion of control predicted aggressive behaviour.
Drivers who believed (perhaps falsely) they were in greater control of their situation, due to superior driving ability or skill, were more likely to drive in risky and aggressive ways.
Driving anger and the illusion of control are a dangerous combination.
On the one hand, a person who is angry and holds the belief they are in control of the situation is more likely to drive in a risky and aggressive fashion.
On the other, research has demonstrated our various cognitive functi
ons, such as attention, reasoning, judgement and decision-making, can be impaired by anger.
The result is a perception of lower risk, a greater willingness to take risks, and cognitive effects that actually increase the risks.
Road rage impacts everybody on the road.
So there is a strong public health rationale for the development and promotion of interventions to reduce driving anger and incidents of road rage.
Fortunately, there is emerging evidence that psychological interventions hold hope for angry drivers. A recent review found evidence supporting cognitive and behavioural interventions to reduce and manage driving anger.
This includes changing anger-evoking cognitive patterns or faulty thinking (such as those interpretations listed above), learning relaxation coping skills for when anger is aroused, and finding strategies to solve difficult situations on the road and de-escalating anger so our choices are less aggressive and more safe.