Gwyne Dyer: Blair takes words from Bush's mouth

Tony Blair flew down from the G8 summit in Scotland especially to be with Londoners in their time of trial, and you can hardly blame him for that.

It's not that we needed him to take charge - it was only four smallish bombs, and the emergency services were doing their job just fine - but the tabloid newspapers would have crucified him if he hadn't shown up and looked sympathetic in public.

No doubt he was feeling sympathetic, too, but the words he used rang false. The accent was British, but the words were the sort of thing that comes out of the mouth of George W. Bush - all about defending British values and the British way of life.

He didn't mention God, so he's still British under it all, but I'm pretty sure I even heard him use Bush's favourite words, "freedom" and "resolve". I'm also pretty certain that this cut very little ice with most Londoners. This is a town that has been dealing with bombs for a long time.

German bombs during the "Blitz" in September-December 1940 killed 13,339 Londoners and seriously injured 17,939 more. In 1944 this city was the first in the world to be hit by pilotless cruise missiles, and later that year it was the first to be struck by long-range ballistic missiles.

During the whole of World War II, about 30,000 Londoners were killed by German bombs and three-quarters of a million lost their homes. Then, between 1971 and 2001, London was the target of 116 bombs set by various factions of the Irish Republican Army, although they only killed 50 people and injured around 1000. Not once did people in London think that they were being attacked because of their values and way of life.

It was quite clear to them that they were being attacked because of British policies abroad, or the policies of Britain's friends and allies.

The people who organised the bombs wanted Britain out of World War II, or British troops out of Northern Ireland, or the British Army out of the Middle East (or maybe, in this instance, the whole G8 to leave the rest of the world alone). Nasty things, bombs, but those who send them your way are usually rational people with rational goals, and they almost never care about your values or your way of life.

Londoners understand that, and it has a remarkably calming effect, because once you have grasped that basic fact then you are no longer dealing with some faceless, formless, terrifying unknown, but just a bunch of people who are willing to kill at random in order to get your Government to change its policies. We don't even know which bunch yet. It could have been Islamist terrorist, or some breakaway faction of the IRA, or even some anarchist group trying to make a point about the G8. But that doesn't matter, really. The point is that they are only terrorists, and they can't hurt all that many people. In a large city the odds are in your favour: it will almost always be somebody else who gets unlucky.

This knowledge breeds a fairly blase attitude to bombs, which was much in evidence this morning when I had to go in to Harley St at noon to pick up my daughter from school. The buses and the underground weren't running and streets were blocked off by police, but everybody was finding ways round this, on foot and in cars. You pull over to let the emergency vehicles pass, and then you carry on.

I do recall thinking, however, that it was a good thing that the bombs had gone off here, not in some American city. Even terrorist bombs in London will be used by the Bush Administration as an argument for locking people up indefinitely, taking away Americans' civil liberties, and perhaps even for invading some other unsuspecting country.

One bomb in an American city, and it would have a free run down to 2008.

Whereas in London, it doesn't work like that. In fact I thought that I could even hear a number of Londoners muttering under their breaths: "Bloody terrorists. Always get it wrong. If only they'd done this two days ago then we wouldn't be lumbered with the bleeding Olympics."