Editorial: Age of drones has a dangerous side

An attack on a senior political target via a drone was inevitable.

Editorial

In the latest Mission Impossible film, a drone is used at one point to draw pursuers away from people being chased.

It's a reminder of how drones can be used in ingenious ways.

People's use of drones is still in its infancy and will expand over time.

Drones are being used in plenty of positive ways. Just some examples: In rural industries in this country, through to helping create stunning photography worldwide, to delivering medical supplies in remote areas of Africa and South America and even providing surveillance to watch over endangered animals hunted by poachers.

But, as is often the case with technological advances, drones can be put to murkier, malicious pursuits.

There have been plenty of instances reported of drones flying contraband into jails around the world.

On the battlefield, Isis (Islamic State) has dropped bombs and grenades via drone. A possible drone attack is now a scenario considered for the security of any major outdoor international event.

German news site DW.com reported last year that "the research and development departments of the world's defence companies have barely begun to explore all the different uses" for drones. It says about 90 countries have drones in their military arsenals, including 11 with armed drones.

The Venezuelan Government says a drone attack targeted President Nicolas Maduro on Sunday. The President was unhurt but several soldiers were reportedly wounded. Despite scepticism that the attack could have been staged, video has surfaced showing a drone exploding and witnesses have said they saw it.

In hindsight, an attack on a senior political target via a drone was inevitable.

Writing in the Washington Post, former director of counterterrorism for the CIA Bernard Hudson says militarised drones "can carry several kilograms of explosives at speeds up to 160km/h with a range of 640km".

He bluntly states weaponised drones have a key advantage: "Most can fly lower than current technology is capable of readily detecting".

He says commercial aircraft are at risk, particularly at take-off and landing. Airport security focuses on ways to stop "threats from people who have access to the facility ... Airports are not designed to guard against purposeful attacks from the sky".

Wired last year looked at the problems of counter-drone measures - shooting them down could cause major damage - and possible solutions such as preventive drone swarms, catch devices or mini missiles.

As Hudson says: "A new and dangerous era in non-state-sponsored terrorism clearly has begun, and no one is adequately prepared to counter it."