By JASPER BECKER in Taipei
Taiwan's pro-independence President Chen Shui-bian narrowly won re-election yesterday when he clinched the country's closest-fought poll by a mere 30,000 votes just a day after surviving an assassination attempt.
His opponent, Lien Chan of the Kuomintang (KMT), immediately said the vote was invalid and demanded a recount.
"It was not a fair election," declared Mr Lien at a rally of cheering supporters.
"We want a recount and demand the ballot boxes should be sealed immediately."
The President meanwhile declared the elections "a victory of democracy".
It is unclear if the KMT can successfully challenge the results. It does, however, have the potential to damage the still untested workings of Taiwan's young democracy.
The national election commission confirmed the results and said the opposition must file a complaint and the matter would be handled according to the regulations.
Taiwanese political commentators compared the situation to the last US presidential election. In 2000 the result was so close and was marred by a dispute over spoiled ballots which had to be referred to the Supreme Court.
In Taiwan there is no mechanical voting. Voters go into a booth and put a cross against one of two candidates. A recount, if it takes place, would therefore not be complicated by such issues as hanging chads.
The narrowness of the result, however, offers plenty of scope for dispute.
President Chen won 50.12 per cent of the vote or 6,470,839 votes, Mr Lien won 49.88 per cent with 6,443,022 votes - but there were 337,297 invalid ballots, more than 10 times the difference between the candidates, so a recount could easily change the result.
With victory delivered by such a tiny margin, the opposition has also been busy stirring up doubts about the mysterious shooting on Friday afternoon which may have spurred some to vote against the KMT or to favour President Chen out of sympathy.
His wife, Wu Shu-chen, has been in a wheelchair since 1985 since she was hit by a truck and run over three times, an incident blamed by many on the KMT.
All the leading members of President Chen's Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) spent years in jail when it was a crime to organise opposition to the KMT during its 40-year dictatorship.
The police have opened an investigation into the shootings but have offered no hints about the identity of the assailants or their motives. The public is pondering allegations that President Chen and his running mate may have deliberately engineered the shooting to help their campaign.
Those responsible appear to have used homemade guns and bullets similar to those used by Taiwanese gangsters or Triads who are heavily involved in domestic politics.
Observers are ruling out the Communists on the mainland, but the KMT is angry that President Chen used the incident to put the armed forces on alert, a way of stoking fears of the mainland.
The President's DPP was not, however, celebrating too triumphantly.
The electorate failed to pass two referendum questions because less than 50 per cent of the electorate voted. KMT supporters boycotted the referendums.
Beijing, which has refused to deal with President Chen for four years, will be infuriated that he was won again but will be pleased that the referendums failed.
Under a new and highly contested law, the Taiwanese were asked if they should beef up their military defences if China refused to remove the 496 missiles pointed at the island and another on whether the government should engage in talks with the mainland.
More than six million said yes, but the results show that President Chen could not be confident of getting through a referendum on independence, an act which Beijing has threatened to use as an excuse to launch an invasion.
Despite the narrow victory, the DPP will be pleased. Four years ago President Chen only won because the KMT vote was split between two candidates, who this time ran under a joint ticket.
- INDEPENDENT
Herald Feature: Taiwan
Related information and links: Taiwan
Doubts cast over Taiwan election
AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.