Experts suggest the she-wolf was not made in the 5th or 6th century BC as believed but as many as 1000 years later, in the Middle Ages. Photo / Supplied
Experts suggest the she-wolf was not made in the 5th or 6th century BC as believed but as many as 1000 years later, in the Middle Ages. Photo / Supplied
The most celebrated and supposedly one of the oldest symbols of the Eternal City may not be a product of the ancient world after all.
The Capitoline Museums' statue of the legendary she-wolf, which was said to have nourished Rome's founders Romulus and Remus on the banks of the RiverTiber, was not crafted by the city's ancestors, the Etruscans, but was made at least 1000 years later in the Middle Ages, some experts now insist.
According to the museum's website, the bronze she-wolf was made in the 5th or 6th century BC, with the figures of the twin brothers added separately in the early 1500s. But studies of the statue's construction suggest otherwise.
And if seeing the iconic work's provenance thrown into doubt weren't bad enough, the museum's authorities have, with red faces, had to emend the statue's description after complaints by German newspapers.
Just days after Rome had, in the eyes of some, had the Eurocrat Premier Mario Monti foisted on it by an Angela Merkel-led European Union cabal, the Germans have been dispensing diktats regarding Italy's celebrated antiquities.
The German daily Der Spiegel led the way in reviving question marks about the statue's origins - forcing the museum to issue a statement this week promising to acknowledge the alternative "hypothesis" of the statue's provenance alongside the usual explanation.
Traditionally, the 76cm-high she-wolf, which is the centrepiece of an eponymous room in the museum, was said to be either the product of an Etruscan workshop in the 5th century BC or even the masterpiece of the 6th century BC Etruscan sculptor Vulca of Veii - not far off Romulus's mythical foundation of the city in 753 BC.
The original - and romantic - version of the statue's origins was undoubtedly central to the work's appeal. Benito Mussolini, Italy's Fascist dictator who fancied himself the founder of the New Rome, was in the habit of sending out copies of the bronze as a gift.
In reality, though, the cat was out of the bag several years ago, when in 2006 La Repubblica published the doubts of a leading expert regarding the statue's real age.
Adriano La Regina, professor of Etruscology at Rome's La Sapienza University, who for decades headed the national archaeological office for Rome, claimed that "unarguable evidence tells us that the she-wolf is not a product of the ancient world".
Another expert, the restoration specialist Anna Maria Carruba, said the she-wolf could not have been made in ancient times because it was cast in one piece - a forging technique that was invented by medieval sculptors.
La Regina has even suggested that the Capitoline Museums were reluctant to release test results indicating the bronze's medieval origins. "The new information about the epoch of the Capitoline bronze has been held back," he said.
Perhaps the Capitoline Museums' authorities can claim that Italy's notorious bureaucracy was to blame for its failure to inform visitors of the insights five years after the new information surfaced.