A Washington Post analysis of photos and videos of the shooting found that former President Trump’s injury appears to be consistent with the attributes of a graze wound from a bullet and not that of bullet fragments, according to two trauma surgeons, Babak Sarani, director of trauma and acute care surgery at George Washington University Hospital, and Joseph Sakran, director of emergency general surgery at Johns Hopkins. The physicians reviewed the Post’s analysis.
“Usually shrapnel flies in random patterns. Because it’s shrapnel, right? It doesn’t go in a straight line. This really looks like a linear laceration is how I would describe,” Sarani told the Post. “So it’s something, it’s going in a straight line which makes you think it’s more the projectile itself, not shrapnel.”
High-velocity rounds, such as those likely fired by Crooks, impart energy, or a blast effect when striking a body. A graze wound like that of the former President would not, Sarani said.
“The bullet literally just grazes you and so very little energy is imparted into you. The rest of it is just dissipated into the air.” he added. “That’s how you, if you are, quote unquote, lucky. The bullet just grazed you.”
Just hours after the assassination attempt, Trump started insisting he had been hit with a bullet.
“I was shot with a bullet that pierced the upper part of my right ear,” he wrote in a Truth Social post that published at 8.42pm on July 13, less than three hours after the shooting. “I knew immediately that something was wrong in that I heard a whizzing sound, shots, and immediately felt the bullet ripping through the skin. Much bleeding took place, so I realised then what was happening.”
Wray testified to the House Judiciary Committee that the exact nature of Trump’s injury remained uncertain. “I think with respect to former President Trump, there’s some question about whether or not it’s a bullet or shrapnel that, you know, hit his ear,” he told lawmakers on Thursday.
‘No evidence that it was anything other than a bullet’ - Trump’s doctor
Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-Tex), the former White House doctor who has been monitoring Trump’s health since the assassination attempt, criticised Wray’s comments.
“There is absolutely no evidence that it was anything other than a bullet,” Jackson wrote in an update on Trump’s health. “Congress should correct the record as confirmed by both the hospital and myself. Director Wray is wrong and inappropriate to suggest anything else.”
Senator Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) sent a letter to Wray, urging him to “correct your testimony before Congress on Wednesday when you indicated it is uncertain whether President Donald J Trump was hit by a bullet, glass, or shrapnel”.
“It is clear to everyone that President Trump survived an assassination attempt by millimetres, as the attempted assassin’s bullet ripped the upper part of his ear,” Graham wrote in a letter that Trump published in a Truth Social post.
It was one of several posts Trump wrote criticising Wray’s testimony over the past two days.
He posted another after the release of the FBI statement confirming he had been shot.
“I assume that’s the best apology that we’ll get from Director Wray,” he said of the FBI’s conclusion, “but it is fully accepted!”
