Last week was one of those times when you sensed how thin the membrane is between the functioning intact life and its total destruction. It's a bit disorienting, isn't it, swishing around in the amniotic fluid of social change? Scary too. The loudest tantrum simply camouflages fear, and you could sense it; after the UK voted "leave" the world was vibrating with adrenalin. When my children had tantrums, it took me far too many years to realise the conventional advice - putting them in time out - is actually the very worst thing you can do. When we are overwhelmed the best way to soothe our hyped-up nervous system is through connection with another human being, not through isolation. So the best thing you can do for your tantrumming child is give them a hug. And when they have calmed down, to listen and work out what was really going on. When it comes to Brexit, I'm still trying to do that. What I've worked out so far:
1 There is hardly such a thing as a war in which it makes no difference who wins. Nearly always one side stands more or less for progress, the other side more or less for reaction. But I couldn't work out whether this was a vote to go backwards or to take a big leap into the future. George Orwell: "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past."
2 There was a picture of English "outies" with placards saying "We want our country back." They were, as Adrian Gill says, "snorting a line of the most pernicious and debilitating Little English drug, nostalgia." But are they going to get it back? No. Because that past of leather on willow does not exist any more, if it ever did.
3 There is a glaring mismatch between what some people thought they were voting for and what they are going to get. The people who thought globalisation was "a force for ill" voted to Leave (52 per cent of them, anyway). Yet there is no sign of protectionism in the Brexit case. For example, Canada has already said it wants a free-trade deal with the UK. If this was a protest against globalisation it was a bit of a dumb one.
4 The outcome of the Leave vote may be more progressive than we realise. The New York Times says: "The lasting damage may be to old ways of thinking."