Why is the Hong Kong case significant?
Experts have been waiting for hard data to show whether people can be reinfected with Covid-19, as is the case in other coronaviruses such as the common cold. Previous cases of reinfection have been down to either the virus lingering in the body or false negative tests. Genetic analysis shows that the two samples were different "clades" or strains of the disease. The first, taken on March 26, was closely related to strains collected in the US and England in March and April, while the second, taken on August 15, was linked to strains collected in Switzerland and England in the northern summer. Today two other cases of reinfection were reported - in the Netherlands and Belgium.
Does this mean there are likely to be other cases of reinfection that we don't know about?
Scientists say that with more than 23 million cases of coronavirus now reported globally, cases of reinfection are not unusual. But Dr Margaret Harris, of the World Health Organisation, told the BBC: "We would expect that given the quality of the surveillance - and the study in Hong Kong shows what a high level of surveillance they are doing there - you would have expected to see many more cases if this was happening a lot."
What implications does this have for immunity to Covid-19?