Labour's climate change spokeswoman Moana Mackey said leaving the response to local authorities resulted in piecemeal planning and decision-making.
"Central government has the resources required to assess where the greatest levels of risk lie, to give guidance on what the priorities should be, and to lay out the range of options available to help communities adapt to climate change.
"Regional authorities are also exposed to legal challenge, something which is highly likely given some of the difficult decisions that will need to be made. Endless litigation is in no one's best interest."
Kapiti Coast District Council attempted to introduce coastal hazard zones in its long-term planning documents but these were blocked by legal action from residents who felt their property values and insurance would be affected.
Read more:
• Climate change will lead to hotter global tempers
• NIWA seeks amateur climate scientists
• Alarming verdict on year of wild weather
• UN: Extreme weather events due to climate change
• Big climate report: Warming is big risk for people
Prime Minister John Key said National was attempting to deal with these complications in its Resource Management reforms.
"It's the Greens and others who are stopping us making those changes," he said.
Green Party climate change spokesman Kennedy Graham said leaving the climate response to councils was "a massive abdication of responsibility".
He said local authorities were desperate for guidance and direction from Government.
Councils were given guidelines by the Ministry for Environment for coastal development, but these were non-binding. The guidelines said planners should consider sea level rises of 50cm to 80cm by 2090, and 10cm for each following decade.
The national policy statement on coastlines required any seaside developments to have a timeframe of 100 years.
The IPCC's report said planning for sea level rise in Australia and New Zealand had developed considerably in the last two decades, but its implementation remained "piecemeal".
Mr Groser said that New Zealand had been lumped in with Australia in this analysis, which had given an inaccurate impression of New Zealand's preparedness.
The report also predicted that Maori would be acutely affected by climate change in New Zealand because the Maori economy was more dependent on climate-sensitive primary industries.
A large proportion of Maori-owned land was in areas which was vulnerable to heavy rainfall or drought.
Maori were also major stakeholders in fisheries and aquaculture, which faced significant risks from changes to ocean temperature and chemistry.
The IPCC authors said that some new economic opportunities may arise for Maori as a result of climate change, such as new forestry growth in cooler regions which previously did not receive enough rainfall or lacked soil nutrients.