A contentious issue in the Australian election was illegal migration, the party leaders competing for the harshest tactics to deal with it.
Prime Minister Tony Abbott's first foreign trip was to Indonesia, the staging post for most Australia-bound boat people, but far from obtaining co-operation, he virtually apologised to the Indonesian President for bothering him. Meanwhile, the Australian Greens leader, Christine Milne, reinforced her wetness credentials by protesting at the Immigration Minister calling them illegal migrants. "People seeking asylum are not illegal, they are human beings," she said, as if anyone is questioning that.
In fact, they are illegal, most being economic migrants, these normally barred whereas access is accorded political refugees by international convention. Political refugee status was meant for people facing death or imprisonment for their views which is not the case with Sri Lankans, Syrians or Afghanis, hellish though their lives may be.
But who can blame them for seeking something better? Sri Lankans flowed in here during the civil war, to our benefit. I know many, both Tamil and Sinhalese, all but one (an employee of mine) medical and other professionals. Of our migrants they're among the cream: studious, hard-working and imbued in decency. But with the civil war over, still they come, fleeing the oppressive mismanagement of their homeland.
Afghani and Syrian migrants need no explanation. The exodus of more than two million Syrians is at crisis proportions for its neighbours, this especially tough on Jordan, a poor country already awash with Iraqis; likewise Lebanon and Turkey struggling to cope with the two million-plus influx. They're now forced further afield, spreading across Europe. Bulgaria has taken the most on a population basis but now intends spending millions it can ill afford on a lengthy fence.