Has there ever been a more absurdly surreal moment, even in United States politics, that unchallengeable theatre of the absurd and the surreal?
One moment, we were watching a property magnate, with one eye on the presidency, the other on his reality TV show ratings, and puffed up like a bullfrog, rejoicing on an airport tarmac in New Hampshire that America's President of two years had finally made public his birth certificate.
The next, America's TV networks interrupted their schedules to cut to the White House, where that self-same President appeared to confirm the momentous fact: not that Barack Obama had indeed been born, but that the happy event indeed took place, as no sane person has ever doubted, on the unimpeachably American soil of Hawaii, one August evening in 1961.
Of late, however, America has seemed to be taking leave of its senses. A quarter of the population, polls showed, and close on a half of Republicans, still refused to believe that unassailable fact.
Yesterday, in a bid to finally close the discussion, the White House released Obama's original "long form" birth certificate, rather than the computer-generated duplicate with which the world thus far has had to make do. It is signed by his mother, the doctor who delivered him and the local registrar.
For the benefit of those who have been living - either literally or metaphorically - on a different planet for the last few years, the document bears witness that Barack Hussein Obama was born to Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Obama Senior at 7.24pm on August 4, 1961, at Kapiolani Maternity and Gynaecological Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii's capital city.
The "birther" controversy - in other words, the contention that the 44th President had, in fact, entered this world in Kenya or Indonesia and that the Hawaii business was a conspiracy - has moved to the lunatic centre of American political debate. And no one has done more to propel it there than Donald Trump.
Forced to react to that change, the President yesterday expressed the hope that the matter could now rest. He had watched "puzzled and bemused", he said, at how the issue had persisted, in defiance of all good sense.
But the final straw, at least in Obama's telling, had come a couple of weeks ago when he delivered a major speech on deficit reduction, as argument raged over how to tackle the national debt that threatens to squeeze the life out of the world's largest economy. And what, he asked, was making headlines next day?
The "birther" question, of course.
"Normally I wouldn't comment on something like this," the President declared. But ... serious problems confronted the country, and: "We don't have time for this kind of silliness."
Nothing would be done "if we just make stuff up, pretend facts are not facts and get distracted by sideshows and carnival barkers".
The release of the document, which has briefly seemed as pivotal to the existence of the republic as the US Constitution would, Obama hoped, lay the dispute to rest, except for a tiny minority who would never be convinced.
But do we really? Up in New Hampshire (just by coincidence, of course, the scene of the country's first presidential primary 11 months hence), the carnival barker par excellence claimed Obama's announcement as a colossal victory for himself.
"I am really proud. I feel I've accomplished something really important that no one else was able to do," Trump proclaimed, with the modesty that marks him. "I am really happy this has taken place. We have some issues that are unbelievably important."
Whether, however, this triumph will see "the Donald" addressing momentous matters like the deficit remains to be seen. Why so long, he wondered: why hadn't Obama produced the certificate back in 2007 and 2008, when Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign was asking for it? And even now, he mused, puffing his chest: "We have to look at it. Is it real?"
Everyone's heard of Donald, even though he promises a decision on whether to enter the race only at the end of next month.
The likes of Tim Pawlenty, Michele Bachmann and Rand Paul would kill for such celebrity right now.
Some, though, ask whether Obama might have done better by keeping the "birther" issue alive a little longer. Its very existence suggested that Republicans were indeed a party of extremists, they note, driving away the independents and centrists needed to win in November 2012.
None other than Karl Rove, who plotted George W. Bush's two White House victories, has said that Trump's obsession with the "birther" issue "means he's off there in the nutty right". At moments like yesterday, however, you could believe that everyone's gone nutty.
- INDEPENDENT
'Birther' crusade drags politics to a surreal low
AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.