Right-wing newspaper columnist Andrew Bolt, a key Abbott ally, condemned his close friend's "disastrous miscalculation" in backing Bishop for so long. "He had many other friends in Government who needed him to consider them, too," said Bolt. Not for the first time, Coalition MPs are questioning Abbott's suitability to lead them to another election.
Yet Abbott stubbornly refuses to concede ground. By saying there are "too many situations where members of Parliament can do things which are inside entitlement but outside public expectations", he has blamed the system for his Speaker's largesse.
Others, like Liberal Party leadership rival Malcolm Turnbull, believe the politics of privilege carries a certain responsibility. "The fundamental principle is often one of common sense," he told ABC radio. "It was Bronwyn's decision ... She didn't have to get a helicopter to Geelong, that's what set this thing off." Turnbull went to Geelong last week by tram and train.
To provide a circuit breaker, Abbott has announced a review of entitlements. It could open a can of worms or disappear into obscurity once public attention has waned.
Ironically, the chief beneficiary of Bishop's extravagance has been the opposition Labor Party. A month ago embattled leader Bill Shorten faced questions over deals and donations he secured as a union leader, but Choppergate stole the spotlight. Bishop is also a prized scalp. She brought unprecedented partisanship to a supposedly independent role, and ejected Labour MPs from the chamber almost 400 times. Shorten accused of Bishop of running a "parliamentary protection racket. [She turned] question time into a complete joke".
Anyone who has witnessed the juvenile antics in Canberra's self-serving political bubble will know how relative that assessment is, and why a fallen Bishop will do little to restore trust in its occupants.