From then on, the judges wrote, the women began receiving 2,500 euros ($3,400) apiece each month from Berlusconi and subsequently they offered nearly identical testimony in court denying that the dinner parties had sexual overtones. The amount is about twice what an average worker in Italy earns a month.
The court made the accusation in explaining its July 19 decision to convict three of Berlusconi's former associates of procuring girls to prostitute themselves at the parties.
Berlusconi wasn't a defendant in the trial. He was convicted in a separate trial of paying for sex with 17-year-old Moroccan girl, Karima el-Mahroug, better known as Ruby, who attended the parties, and then trying to cover it up. Berlusconi's lawyers have said they would appeal the verdict, seven-year prison term and a lifetime political ban.
Berlusconi has defended the payments to the girls, saying it is simply his nature to try to help people in need. Most of the women were aspiring show girls hoping to get a break on one of Berlusconi's Mediaset television programs. Many lived in apartments owned by Berlusconi, wore jewelry that were gifts from him and some drove cars that he gave them for their birthdays.
In a statement Friday, Berlusconi attorneys Niccolo Ghedini and Piero Longo said there was "no connection whatsoever" between the January 2011 meeting and the payments the girls received, which the lawyers said only began in March of the following year.
The evidence tampering accusations, they said in a statement carried by the LaPresse news agency, "are completely disconnected from reality and factual substantiation." They predicted that prosecutors, who had all this evidence in their possession earlier and didn't press charges, would drop the case.
In its decision, the judges wrote that the girls gave "overlapping" testimony that contradicted testimony given by other participants in the parties who described sexually charged evenings where girls ended up in their underwear or dressed like nuns, dancing for Berlusconi and letting him touch them.
"All the people who received this amount of money gave declarations at trial that were perfectly overlapping, even in the use of language that was incongruent with their cultural background," the judges wrote. "In particular, there was a repetition of names, terms and phrases that the witnesses, when asked, said they didn't know the meaning of the word or phrase that they had used."
"These were declarations that were directed in favor of Berlusconi," the judges wrote.
The judges said it wasn't merely an anomaly that Berlusconi was paying monthly stipends to witnesses testifying in a trial in which he was indirectly implicated. "It's an illegal act: Tampering with evidence."
In saying they had forwarded all the trial documentation to prosecutors, the judges accused Berlusconi of making the payments, and two of his lawyers of participating in the Jan. 15, 2011 meeting. The judges accused the women of giving false testimony.
___
Follow Nicole Winfield at www.twitter.com/nwinfield
