The artificial intelligence-based study found it unlikely that temperature increase could be held below 2C, even with tough emissions cuts. And that’s where the AI really differs from scientists, who had been forecasting using computer models that were based on past observations, Diffenbaugh said.
In a high-pollution scenario, the AI calculated, the world would hit the 2C mark around 2050. Lower pollution could stave that off until 2054, the machine learning calculated.
In contrast, the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change figured in its 2021 report that the same lower-pollution scenario would see the world pushing past 2C sometime in the 2090s.
Cornell University climate scientist Natalie Mahowald, who wasn’t part of the Diffenbaugh study but was part of the IPCC, said the study makes sense and fits with what scientists know, but seems a bit more pessimistic.
There’s a lot of power in using AI, and in the future, that may be shown to produce better projections, but more evidence is needed before concluding that, Mahowald said.
Normally, climate scientists use a bunch of computer model simulations, some running hot and some cold, and then try to figure out which ones are doing the best. That’s often based on how they performed in the past or in simulations of the past, Diffenbaugh said. He said what the AI does is more keyed to the climate system now.
“We’re using this very powerful tool that is able to take information and integrate it in a way that no human mind is able to do, for better or for worse,” Diffenbaugh said.
Each year, government climate negotiators at a United Nations summit proclaim that they have managed to “keep 1.5 alive”. But with the latest study, there’s a divide among scientists on how true that really is. Diffenbaugh said there’s been so much warming already that it really doesn’t matter how pollution is cut in the next several years - the world will hit 1.5C, the AI figures.
Zeke Hausfather of the tech company Stripe and Berkeley Earth, who was not part of the study, agreed, saying it was time to “stop pretending” that limiting warming to 1.5C is possible. Some scenarios do see temperatures warming past the mark, but then coming back down, something called “overshoot”.
Other scientists not involved with the study, such as the University of Pennsylvania’s Michael Mann and Climate Analytics’ Bill Hare and Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, maintain 1.5C is still alive. They say one rapid decarbonisation scenario that Diffenbaugh didn’t examine shows the world can mostly keep under the threshold.
If the world can cut its carbon emissions in half by 2030, “then warming can be limited to 1.5C” with a tiny overshoot and then reductions to get under the mark, Hare said.
Believing that the world can no longer keep warming below 1.5C “is a self-fulfilling prophecy”, Mann said by email. “In the end, it’s easy to overinterpret the significance of a precise threshold like 1.5C of warming. The challenge is to limit warming as much as possible.”