US President Donald Trump made a bit of history on Saturday when he announced that the Persian Gulf kingdom of Bahrain would establish full diplomatic relations with Israel. Bahrain's move, a month after the United Arab Emirates normalised relations, brings the number of Arab countries that recognise Israel to four
Another Gulf state recognises Israel: Why it matters
By Mark Landler
New York Times·
6 mins to read
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo meets with Bahraini King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa and Bahraini Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa. Photo / AP
AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.
Trump's cultivation of Saudi Arabia and its gulf neighbours was an important ingredient, as was his desire to sell these countries advanced weaponry. But it was serendipity, as much as spadework, that set the stage for the White House ceremony on Wednesday at which the Israelis and Emiratis will formalise their new relationship. (Bahrain will send officials to the ceremony.)
What are the advantages of closer ties?
Israel and the gulf Arab states began establishing tentative links after the Oslo peace accords between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organisation in 1993. They opened trade missions in each other's capitals, although several were closed after a surge of Israeli Palestinian violence in the second Intifada, which erupted in 2000.
The links grew stronger in the past decade as the Israelis and gulf Arabs made common cause over Iran, which both sides view as a dire threat. In 2015, the United Arab Emirates allowed Israel to establish a diplomatic presence at the International Renewable Energy Agency in Abu Dhabi. Qatar has worked with Israel to broker a cease-fire in the Hamas-dominated enclave of Gaza. The sultanate of Oman played host to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 2018.
AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.
For the gulf states, Israel is a hedge against the declining role of the United States in the region, as well as a rich trading partner with a high-tech economy. For Israel, ties to the gulf ease its isolation and are a way to counter pressure from the Palestinians to negotiate a new state, since the backing of fellow Arabs is a linchpin of that long campaign.
Why now?
The chance for progress came, paradoxically, because of Arab alarm over Trump's effort to broker an Israeli-Palestinian peace accord. The Trump plan was heavily tilted toward Israel, essentially giving Netanyahu a green light to annex territory in the occupied West Bank.
For the gulf Arabs, annexation would be a fatal blow to closer ties with Israel. Under the Saudi-led Arab Peace Initiative, Israel would win full recognition from the Arab world only by resolving its conflict with the Palestinians and granting their aspiration for statehood.
It fell to a well-connected diplomat from the United Arab Emirates, Yousef al-Otaiba, to lay out the choice for Israel. In a column on the front page of a Hebrew-language paper, Yedioth Ahronoth, in June, al-Otaiba, the ambassador to Washington, told Israelis they could have annexation or normalisation — but not both.
The diplomat also approached Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, with the same message. But while the Emiratis were drawing a line in the sand, they were also making an offer — one that Kushner, hungry for a success after three years of fruitless Middle East diplomacy, quickly accepted. He pressured Netanyahu to hold off on annexation in return for normalisation, which Trump could claim as a diplomatic victory in an election year.
The Emiratis had other reasons for moving now. It helped seal their purchase of sophisticated American weapons: F-35 fighter jets, Reaper drones and EA-18G Growler jets. Analysts say Bahrain's move could help that country secure air defence systems from the United States.
What happens next?
AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.
Other Arab countries are likely to follow Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates in recognising Israel, with Sudan and Oman potential candidates, according to some analysts. But Bahrain's decision is tantalising because of its close ties and dependence on its much larger neighbour, Saudi Arabia.
Bahrain's monarch, Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa, never would have acted without the assent of the Saudis, analysts said, which means this could be a harbinger of an eventual Saudi move to normalise ties.
Saudi Arabia has already taken symbolic steps, like allowing Israeli commercial flights to use its airspace. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the country's de facto ruler, suggested he is open to recognising Israel, although his statements have sometimes put him at odds with his more conservative father, King Salman, who has steadfastly reaffirmed the traditional Arab position on Palestinian statehood.
Trump has put the Saudis at the heart of his Middle East diplomacy. His first presidential visit was to the Saudi capital, Riyadh. He boasted about negotiating a multibillion-dollar arms sale to the kingdom. And he has defended Crown Prince Mohammed despite evidence that he ordered the brutal assassination of the Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi.
The Saudis grudgingly went along with Trump's decision to move the US Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. For all their expressions of support for the Palestinians, they, like other Arab states, are much less committed to the Palestinian cause than they once were. Girding against Iran is considered a more urgent priority, analysts say, than fuelling a decades-long Arab antagonism toward Israel.
Trump and Kushner have bet that their cultivation of Saudi Arabia will pay off in support for American peacemaking. Delivering Saudi recognition of Israel would be an immense prize, one that ranks with the Camp David or Oslo Accords, given that country's weight in the Arab world. But the Saudis take seriously their authorship of the Arab Peace Initiative, and Trump would not be the first US president to be let down by them.
Much will depend on the results of the US election, of course. But with annexation off the table, at least for now, Indyk said there was a window for the Palestinians to resume talks with Israel.
"On the face of it, something that was bad for the Palestinians could generate positive momentum for the peace process," he said.
Written by: Mark Landler
© 2020 THE NEW YORK TIMES
