Adventure tourism inherently carries risk, writes Martin Sneddon. But the customer has a right to expect that avoidable risks are eliminated.
I know I'm on a hiding to nothing sticking my head up to defend the safety culture within New Zealand's adventure tourism industry. This week the coroner passed down his verdict on the cause of the Fox Glacier crash, which took nine lives, some of them international visitors. The families are naturally still grieving and have a right to express their views, but some things have to be said.
A Herald editorial was right to say avoidable safety errors either directly caused or contributed to the Fox Glacier crash. But the emotion around this, which will almost certainly recur when the results of the Carterton ballooning accident investigation are made public, shouldn't obscure the fact that significant safety improvements have been made within the industry since the results of the 2009/10 Labour Department adventure safety review.
Adventure tourism inherently carries risk. No amount of risk management can eliminate this. But the customer has a right to expect that avoidable risks are eliminated. Sadly, that wasn't the case in the Fox Glacier crash. No one is trying to defend these types of accidents, but we are focused on applying the lessons as quickly and effectively as possible.
Adventure Safety is one of five major strategic priorities for my organisation, the Tourism Industry Association (TIA), which has close to 400 adventure and outdoor operators among our 1500 members. We have two skilled senior staff members dedicated fulltime to delivery of this strategy.