A decade ago Macau was pretty sleepy, having opened an airport only in 1995. Now it is a boom town.
Why do some colonial experiences leave lasting prosperity while others leave stagnation or worse? Chinese New Year celebrations are a good time to reflect on the experience of one of the world's most boisterous economies - a land where increased domestic and international tourism reflects such prosperity.
Last month we were in Hong Kong and had a spare day, so decided to take the ferry across to Macau for a few hours. As we walked round the rather sleepy old town my companion remarked on how utterly different it was from the high-rise booming Hong Kong.
Both are prosperous - I'll come to that in a moment - but Macau feels like a typical southern European medium-sized city of 500,000 people, while the other has become a great global metropolis, now past seven million. Was it, my companion pondered, because Macau got the Portuguese and Hong Kong got the Brits?
That set me thinking about the role that Europeans have played in fostering China's present boom. Anyone with any sensitivity to Chinese history will be aware that Europeans were not exemplary visitors the Opium Wars, the Boxer Rebellion and so on. But the plain fact remains that Hong Kong and Macau have the highest standards of living in China. Both are in the top 10 countries or regions in the world for life expectancy. Macau has on some calculations the fourth highest GDP per head in the world, behind Luxembourg, Switzerland and Norway.