Overall, McClay rates the WTO meeting at five out of 10. He gives nine out of 10 for the United Arab Emirates hosts, who turned on a superb event in Abu Dhabi. And a “very positive sort of eight out of 10” for his New Zealand team, who spearheaded one of the few concrete gains to emerge from the meeting – a two-year extension to the e-commerce moratorium.
As McClay – who chaired the e-commerce talks – notes, this was recognition for New Zealand, which posted almost the sole achievement from the meeting, which was in e-commerce. He has received messages putting the success down to New Zealand and his delegation, which he believes is a good thing for a small economy.
The e-commerce move gives New Zealand businesses, especially small- and medium-sized exporters, predictability, certainty and transparency. Agreement was reached against significant opposition “just before midnight” on the crucial negotiating day.
It bears saying here that New Zealand’s experienced negotiators are deeply immersed in the strategies necessary to wear down resistance and use fast-eroding time as an asset in such talks.
The WTO’s 166 members did commit to strengthening the rules-based trade system exporters rely on, and accelerating progress towards restoring functioning disputes settlement by the end of the year.
Now back in the saddle as Minister of Trade after a six-year spell on the parliamentary opposition benches, McClay has his work cut out for him. Free trade is no longer a geopolitical priority. While McClay missed out on meeting his peers at last year’s Apec meeting, he did hold bilateral meetings with 14 countries in Abu Dhabi, including the United Arab Emirates (UAE); China; the European Union; India; the United Kingdom; the United States; Colombia; Brazil; and Saudi Arabia.
The reality is that the uneven benefits of global trade are undermining confidence in the WTO. There is still no coherence in the WTO’s appellate system and a real risk remains that it could all fall apart.
Geopolitical rivalries and protectionism are also threatening the gains of globalisation.
McClay notes that the big players weren’t as engaged as they could have been at the WTO meeting: “You need the US and EU to drive stuff through … but they were not using their political capital at the moment.”
McClay steps carefully about the fact that major elections this year, including in the United States, have the capacity to further derail global trade.
Former US President Donald Trump has flagged raising tariffs on all goods exported into the United States to 10 per cent. This would have an immediate effect on our own exporters. Trump has also talked about introducing 60 per cent tariffs on Chinese goods imported to the US – a step that could no doubt ignite another trade war with major implications worldwide.
Much of McClay’s work takes place in capitals. That’s where he and key officials like Ministry of Foreign Affairs deputy secretary Vangelis Vitalis are spending a great deal of time endeavouring to open further markets like India and work to get non-tariff barriers reduced in existing markets as the ability to post real gains from the WTO negotiations remain remote.