This condition meant Wiggins would have an immediate inspection of his herd done by a professional nominated by MPI. He would then be required to have follow-up inspections every six months, at his own cost.
MPI animal welfare regional manager Joanna Tuckwell said while farming can be stressful, there was no excuse for the behaviour that led to these injuries, which were consistent with excessive force and incorrect technique being applied during handling.
"Even though farmers will sometimes use a cow's tail to steer the animal where it needs to go, best practice is not to lift or twist tails. It takes excessive force to break a cow's tail," Tuckwell said.
"The cows that Mr Wiggins deliberately ill-treated would have been in considerable pain. This action was simply cruel and unnecessary."
The court heard that in June 2018, MPI launched an investigation into tail breaks and tail docking at Wiggins' farm. Two MPI animal welfare inspectors and a veterinarian inspected the tails of 195 cows.
The inspection found that 136 of 195 cows in Wiggins' herd had broken tails. Of those, 111 of these tails had multiple breaks – between two and six per tail.
Also noted was the fact that 130 of the 136 cows' tails were assessed as having breaks in the mid or high sections of their tails. This section is the thicker part of the tail and would have required considerable force to cause a break.
Wiggins' explanation for the tail breaks was that he was under time pressure and that he had bent the tails while pushing the cows in the milking shed.
Tuckwell said MPI took its role as the regulator for animal welfare compliance very seriously and where there was clear evidence of offending a prosecution occurred.
"Our advice to all people in charge of animals who may be having personal challenges on the farm is to seek help before it comes to this."
