The red meat sector has expressed concern that emissions trading scheme proposals as they stood were unwieldy and would add unnecessary complexity, cost and confusion to the industry as a whole.
Justin Courtney, head of communications and sustainability at Silver Fern Farms said in its current form, the zero carbon Bill held "significant fish hooks".
"As it stands, processors would effectively have to set up a trading desk to manage ETS units, forecast livestock flows and then pass that cost through to the farmer, potentially with a rebate in that system which adds significant regulatory complexity.
"It's like a trading foreign exchange desk for us which is totally clouded from market signals which is that it is based on carbon demand, which as a price could be anywhere between $30 and $200. As a processor we have to manage that supply and demand.
"All processors would have to scale up to absorb that cost and pass it back to the farmer. That's not a market signal around the price of carbon, it's an administrative burden."