Sue Boyde responds to Bruce Dickens' opinion article Waxing lyrical on 1080 isn't credible
Bruce Dickens is a farmer and orchardist. The Country has published his thoughts on 1080. He has been a hunter for years – I have been a tramper for some 30 years, and my experiences are different to his.
Bruce says "Do you want to drink from a stream or river that may have 1080 in it?" I live near an area that gets 1080 every three years. I always go out, a few days after the drop, and search there for a day or two. I have not found any dead birds, and I hear normal healthy bird life. The last time I found one dead rat, and smelled several dead possums. I always make a point of drinking from the streams, because I know that there is no fluoroacetate from 1080 in them. If I were there in the first eight hours after the drop, I might possibly get a tiny trace – half the level of fluoroacetate that is present in my morning cup of tea.
Poisoning pigs with phosphorus? Now that's a seriously cruel poison. And so is the anticoagulant rat-bait that most of us have used. 1080 by comparison is classed as moderately humane. Hunters who claim that 1080 is a terribly cruel poison should watch out, because hunting itself is seriously inhumane. Dogs attacking a pig, brutal. Deer hunters think they always hit their mark and kill the deer instantly, but the bush around the major road-ends has enough injured deer dying slowly to enrage PETA and SAFE.