Northland Regional Council chairman Bill Shepherd's use of his casting vote to break a 4-4 deadlock over the issue of whether or not to include provisions for the management of genetically modified organisms in the council's proposed regional plan has outraged critics of the technology, who have vowed to fight it in court.
GE-Free Northland spokesman Martin Robinson said the "flawed" decision, that would fail to protect Northland's existing valuable GE-free status and biosecurity, flew in the face of the need for the plan to be in alignment with the Auckland Council's strong precautionary and prohibitive GE/GMO provisions in its unitary plan, strong district council, community and submitter support for such protection, and clear direction for such wording in the operative Northland regional policy statement.
"Earlier this year the NRC made a preliminary decision to place strong precautionary and prohibitive GE/GMO provisions in the Coastal Marine Area section of the new regional plan, but yesterday it failed to make a sound decision on the critically important GE/GMOs issue, ignoring the overwhelming scientific, legal, and cultural evidence presented by 99 per cent of submitters supporting GMO rules in the plan," Mr Robinson said.
"Our community group is also greatly concerned that the NRC also limited discussion on this important issue to the Coastal Marine Area (CMA) early on, rather than addressing the serious risks of outdoor use of GE/GMOs to Northland soils, waterways and land-based primary producers."
The process followed by the NRC regarding the genetic engineering issue had been highly controversial, he added, with a lack of transparency and the council wasting almost $14,000 of ratepayer funds this year "investigating" and "deliberating on" the already clearly resolved liability issue regarding GE/GMOs.