West Otago sheep and beef farmer Al Body has built a detainment bund as part of a project to reduce the stormwater contaminants entering the Pomahaka River. Photo / Shawn McAvinue
West Otago farmer Al Body is giving his time, land and ingenuity to a detainment bund project in a bid to reduce stormwater contaminants entering the Pomahaka River. He talks to Otago Daily Times’ Shawn McAvinue about some of the fun moments of the project, including crawling more than 20m backward in a 60cm-wide pipe, making a release valve from chopping boards and continually learning how to build a better bund.
West Otago farmer Al Body is embracing a project trying to find a way to reduce stormwater contaminants entering the Pomahaka River.
The project was designed to find if an embankment to control the flow of stormwater across the clay soil of his hilly, more than 380ha sheep, beef and deer farm near Tapanui, can reduce contaminants reaching downstream waterways.
Funders for the three-year trial include the Ministry for Primary Industries and the Otago Regional Council.
Construction of the bund cost about $30,000 and the council paid for a third of it.
Body said the bund had been operational since April this year and had a 30ha ponding area, able to hold more than 4000cu m of stormwater.
After it rained, stormwater was left in the pond for up to three days, giving contaminants time to settle on the pasture of the pond floor.
A feature of the bund was a 24m-long and 600mm-wide plastic pipe connecting the pond to weirs, where stormwater samples were automatically collected before flowing on to the river, he said.
The National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (Niwa) had been contracted to install the water testing technology to collect up to 24 samples at a time for its scientists to analyse.
He had collected four sets of samples and couriered them to Niwa for testing, Body said.
When Southern Rural Life visited the farm on Wednesday last week, Body was set to empty the pond.
He was emptying the pond because heavy rain was forecast the next day and he wanted it to have the capacity to hold it.
Before emptying the pond, he noticed the water level of the pond had dropped, indicating a leak in the pipe.
After the pond was empty, he vowed to enter the pipe and repair the leak.
He had been discovering ways to “fine-tune” the operation of the bund, he said.
“Every time you have a cock-up, it creates a learning for the next person.”
He had been inside the pipe before doing concrete work.
“I got stuck there and I had to back out 24 metres, which wasn’t much fun,” he said, laughing.
If the bund proved to be effective, he would get his farm mapped by drones to find suitable areas to build more bunds, at his own expense.
The bunds would join other environmental projects on his farm, which include riparian planting, fencing waterways and “retrofitting” native forestry.
Managing the national bund project is geologist John Paterson, who was born and raised in East Chatton near Gore and now farms deer and sheep in Rotorua.
He was expecting the first results from the three-year bund trail in West Otago soon, Paterson said.
Body was a “big asset” to the project, he said.
“He has been so helpful and been getting his hands dirty with the trial work.”
The main funder of the Phosphorus Mitigation Project was the ministry, which had provided more than $2 million through its Sustainable Land Management and Climate Change fund.
He praised the council for funding some of the cost to build the bund in West Otago.
The project also had a bund trial on a farm on clay soils near Kaipara Harbour, on the northwestern side of the North Island, Paterson said.
A new bund trial was about to start on a hill-country farm in the King Country.
“We are quite excited about that. The steeper the country, the harder it is to fit detainment bunds, so it is going to be interesting to see how they perform and fit into that landscape.”
Detainment bunds had been proven to work in the free-draining soil of farms in Rotorua, intercepting about 60 per cent of stormwater contaminants.
For a bund site to be effective, the ponding area of a bund needed to be able to hold a minimum of 120 cu m of stormwater per hectare.
If more stormwater could be held in a ponding area, it had the potential to reduce flash flooding and the amount of contaminants entering waterways, increase the resilience of a landscape and replenish aquifers, he said.
A bund was another tool for landholders to improve water quality.