Last year, a UN expert panel recommended against using only intensity-based targets when companies make climate promises.
However, the Science-based Targets Initiative (an international accreditation body) allows food growers to use targets per kilo of food.
The top climate science body, the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), said climate action should not compromise food production, but also said diets in wealthy countries needed to move towards a higher share of plant protein and only moderate amounts of animal products (especially beef) to curb the acceleration of climate-fuelled disasters.
Although Fonterra’s target seems much stronger than Westpac’s, at 30 per cent by 2030, it appears to count various savings that Westpac’s does not, for example stopping the clearing of trees, which had already done.
Westpac is focused on farm management, according to a report by the bank’s parent company.
According to Stats NZ, dairy cattle numbers have fallen 6 per cent since 2017, while sheep numbers fell 8 per cent.
Beef numbers were up 8 per cent over the same period, but from a lower base than either sheep or dairy animals.
Milk production has also been falling, DairyNZ figures show.
If those trends continue, a reduction in emissions per kilo of food produced would result in an overall drop in absolute emissions of greater than the 9-10 per cent target.
Westpac, like other New Zealand lenders, is a member of the Net Zero Banking Alliance, via its Australian parent company.
Joining the alliance means agreeing to get the emissions of the whole businesses - including the impact of the companies banks lend to - to a level compatible with keeping global heating to 1.5C.
BNZ has already set a target of cutting by 11 per cent the climate impact-per-kilo of food produced by its farmer customers, by 2030.
ASB and ANZ’s parent banks have also signed up to the alliance and will need to produce targets in the next couple of years.
- RNZ
