Climate Change Minister Minister James Shaw has snubbed recommendations from the environment watchdog for two separate Emissions Trading Schemes — one for fossil fuels and one for farming and forestry.
In his Farms, Forests and Fossil Fuels report late last month Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment (PCE) Simon Upton said only farming-based emissions should be offset by forestry since the duration of cooling from forests is more closely matched with the warming effects of biological gases like methane and nitrous oxide.
He argued the current approach — which relies heavily on the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) and planting trees to offset fossil fuel emissions — allows companies to avoid reducing our fossil fuel consumption, which is the main driver of climate change.
Massey University's Prof Ralph Sims agreed with Upton's premise and told Radio New Zealand the tree-planting option companies like Air New Zealand and Z Energy have at the moment was "very much a temporary measure and it shouldn't ever be used as an excuse not to try and reduce their carbon dioxide".
However, Catherine Leining, policy fellow at Motu Economic and Public Policy Research, didn't think splitting up the ETS was a good idea. She said if New Zealand was starting to design mitigation policy with a blank slate the proposed two-system approach could be a valid choice.