The goal is to protect more tracts of US forest to help fight climate change.
The past decade has seen a rapidly expanding market in which companies pay landowners to grow or conserve trees, which absorb carbon from the atmosphere, to counterbalance their own carbon emissions.
For owners of smaller family tracts, selling carbon offsets or other credits would give them an alternative income to harvesting their timber or selling their property to a developer.
Companies were pouring billions of dollars into environmental credits, but small landowners faced daunting barriers to eligibility, American Forest Foundation president and chief executive Rita Hite said.
To participate, owners need to take an inventory of their forested property, have a land management plan and run models to calculate the land’s carbon value.
“Previously, if you didn’t have 5000 acres or more, you weren’t participating in these markets,” Hite said.
“Not only are there technical hurdles, but also financing hurdles.”
The American Forest Foundation and the Nature Conservancy launched a joint programme four years ago that covers many of the costs for family landowners to sell carbon offsets for their land.
Those groups and other non-profits will be eligible to apply for grants of up to US$25 million to provide direct help to landowners under the Biden administration’s programme.
So will state forestry agencies, university agricultural extension services and others.
The money could pay professionals to help owners develop land management plans or to connect them with project managers who serve as middlemen between owners and companies seeking environmental credits.
The grants were welcomed by John Littles, a leader of the Sustainable Forestry and African American Land Retention Network, which hosted the Georgia conference.
The group represents 1600 black landowners across eight southern states - Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.
“Most of the time, we’re left out - more specifically, people of colour,” Littles said.
“We’re not afforded the opportunity to help design the programmes, so the programmes are mainly now designed for large landholdings and large acreage.”
Littles said his network planned to apply for a grant under the new programme. But he was not sure how much demand there would be from landowners.
He said that would largely depend on whether owners of smaller acreages could get enough money from conservation credits.