In our new smartphone dominated age it's sometimes easy to forget just how much of our personal information is held by telecommunications companies and, what's more important, the access that other agencies have to it.
Late last year I decided to try a little experiment to see what would happen if I asked my cell phone provider if it would tell me if any government agencies had request access to my phone records. It was inspired in part by the efforts of Australian journalist Ben Grubb and the long running fight he had with Telstra to obtain his internet and phone metadata. Given the lengthy battle he had, I was curious to see what might happen here.
Now, I lead a reasonably virtuous and abstemious lifestyle, being a reporter and the father of a small child really doesn't leave a lot a free time for nefarious activity. So I was not really expecting that there would be too much in the way of controversy around my request. However it was not as straightforward as you'd might expect.
My cell phone service provider Spark gave me a "neither confirm nor deny" response after I made my request. Their reasoning was as follows; because they have obligations under various pieces of legislation to provide data to law enforcement agencies they didn't want to get into a situation where they could compromise an official investigation.
The analogy they used and they were at pains to point out they didn't think I was one, was that of a drug dealer who suspected their phone was being monitored by police. Spark's position was that they couldn't afford to be in a position where they could give definitive information that could confirm whether or not authorities were conducting an investigation. To do so, they argued, could lead to the prejudice of the maintenance of the law. Spark's view was I should instead approach individual government agencies and ask them if they'd requested my cell phone data.