It is hard to escape the sense that Education Minister Hekia Parata should have gone further when announcing a limited inclusion of digital technology in the school curriculum.
That is certainly the view of technology industry leaders. In an open letter to the minister, three of them made their disappointment abundantly clear, arguing New Zealand secondary students needed to be better equipped if they were to pursue technology careers.
The letter was a response to the move to include the teaching of digital technology in schools as a strand of the technology learning area. Her critics wanted bolder decisions, that put the subject on a par with maths and physics. It might have come as a surprise to many that the subject was not already an integral part of the school day for students, given the digital world youngsters inhabit.
But curriculum change is a slow-moving beast. The embrace of digital technology followed the first curriculum review in six years, and took 12 months to complete. Then it failed to provide any real clarity about the classroom resources required to encourage pupils, in the words of Parata, "to develop skills, confidence and interest in digital technologies and lead them to opportunities across the diverse and growing IT sector".
Pupils spend countless hours in a digital space. Any measures which help them understand and manage that world, even belated ones, are welcome. It means that New Zealand students will be better equipped for the digital environment they occupy, and be more than simply consumers of technology. And it means more will have the skills to create the new technologies that industry is demanding.