There was no third umpire on duty at the Auckland Nines last weekend. Referees had to make the call on the spot and with 30 games in 16 hours there is no time for mucking about. The decisions made under pressure by those on field may have lacked consistency but they would have made match-fixing impossible.
I wasn't surprised to see that research by Oxford University academics Carl Frey and Michael Osborne puts umpires high on the list of professions susceptible to computerisation.
It is a scary document. Many of us white-collar types have smugly dismissed the luddite angst of blue-collar workers as their industries have been invaded by the relentless advance of innovation. Our time might be up.
Technology has allowed machines to replicate manual tasks but gaining an economic reward for thinking has remained the preserve of humans and border collies. But the rapid advance of software algorithms, ability to aggregate vast amounts of data and sophisticated advances in robotics have changed this. Computers can now exceed humans in relatively complex cognitive tasks in such diverse fields as legal drafting and matchmaking.
Frey and Osborne used three characteristics of a job to determine the likelihood of it being automated: social intelligence, creativity and perception/manipulation. Jobs that require a high degree of all three, such as choreography, are safe. Those that need none of these three, such as bank tellers, face extinction.