He was 30-love up in the final game. The winner was taking all. The court was of the public variety, and the net sagged in the middle, blown about through spring by the winds that whipped off the grey waters of Caroline Bay. Summer had officially begun, yet the clouds hung low that afternoon in Timaru, and the temperature had dropped in sympathy.
Two local boys were playing a half-hearted game of one-on-one on the adjacent basketball court as a man in dark green overalls repainted the sideline over a patch of freshly rolled bitumen. They would not have known that barely 40m from them the Most Important Tennis Match of The Year was reaching its chaotic climax. How could they have known?
The tennis match in question was the annual Mango Chicken Cup, a tournament named after a sordid and sickening story of financial opportunism, of the blurred lines between friendship and enmity, of mistrust and missing wallets, and of a half-eaten poppadom. The real story is so long and protracted that it cannot possibly be retold in the limited space available here. Make no mistake, though, its plotline is as rich as a korma, as complex as a saag, as incendiary as a fiery vindaloo.
The combatants that day numbered three, which you will note is an irregular number for a tennis match of any magnitude, let alone the Mango Chicken Cup. This fact was not lost on the trio, and they had enlisted, for the purposes of achieving a result, "Timaru Tim", who had been spending the afternoon battling it out with his rather competitive mother on court one. If he had only foreseen the capitulation that was to come, he may well have decided to pack his racquet and head back to the old lady's place for tea.
On the other side, deep in the court, was a man of vintage pedigree. As a tennis player, he relied on his not inconsiderable guile in lieu of any genuine pace or desire to cover more court than was absolutely necessary - which for him was about two lineal metres of the baseline. In this way he was able to apportion blame to his partner at least 80 per cent of the time. On all other occasions, when it was clear the buck stopped with him, he would swiftly and most sincerely compliment his opponent, carefully conveying a sense that not even the greats of the game would have had the capacity to stop the point being conceded.