The backlash has begun. Oracle Team USA chief executive Sir Russell Coutts said he was "astounded" at the "outrageous" punishment by the America's Cup international jury and a lawyer for one of the sailors said the process was "completely unfair".
Coutts told the San Francisco Chronicle he thought the jury might have been swayed by the New Zealand media which "had a win out of all this".
A Herald on Sunday column from this writer last weekend was quoted in the Chronicle, particularly the section which advocated that the jury should "boot Oracle out of their own regatta. They are unlikely to do that. The Cup would pass automatically to Emirates Team NZ and would not be fought out on the water. There are all sorts of commercial, sponsor and contractural realities that will likely prevent that. Ethically, that's what should happen. It was cheating. Deliberate or accidental; institutional or the act of rogue elements - it doesn't matter. It's cheating."
The lawyer, Sydney Luscutoff, said his client (the unnamed Sailor X, whose case was dismissed) and other OTUSA employees were accused in a completely unfair process, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. Luscutoff said two members of the jury conducted the investigations, placing themselves as prosecutors before helping decide the case themselves.
"It's utterly unfair and bizarre," he said.