The significance of Team New Zealand's decision to put four of their sailors on static bicycles rather than have them on traditional grinding pedestals has been played down in some quarters.
Sir Ben Ainslie said in a recent column his team had looked closely at it but eventually decided against, due to the trade-offs involved, the principal one being manoeuvrability.
Meldrum, though, is adamant the "five contact points" his riders have make the system extremely stable.
"There is some truth in the arguments against it, where crew manoeuvrability can be compromised. If you execute manoeuvres in the same fashion as grinding transitions, there are some small delays with engagement.
"However, the 'transition' argument is the tail wagging the dog -- it's just a case of adapting and learning new methods, and having the right architecture of the control system it drives. We have proven our manoeuvrability is not disadvantaged by any degree relevant to the added power we benefit from."
And that massive increase in power is the key. New Zealand have even added a professional Olympic sprint cyclist, Simon van Velthooven, to their roster.
"On a Wattbike, our guys can hold 1000 watts for a minute, 1300 for 30 seconds. I think you would battle to do half of this with your arms. Perhaps this is why we don't see arm-powered bikes in the Tour de France."