Condense the swollen law book and its accompanying sub-sections, appendices and addenda, in fact make that a project with a capital P if you are going to claim those entertainment audiences you are always talking about.
We've all been flummoxed by the rulings about players challenging for the ball in the air before we had Aaron Cruden tipped on his head by the Sharks with no punishment.
It's as bewildering as the breakdown shambles with players off their feet, playing the ball on the ground, wanting to ruck but not allowed, massive kinks in the offside line and referees issuing all sorts of instructions.
Circumnavigating the Arc de Triomphe is a leisurely drive compared to that fiasco.
Then we come to rugby's most cryptic work when the forwards, in the name of crafty deception, go about their work at the driving maul where they form a shield in front of their mate who is carrying the pigskin.
Defenders are not allowed to come around the side and not permitted to sack the wedge while the side in possession can break off, reform and keep shifting the ball to the tail of the drive.
Then at Hamilton we went to another level as the Cheetahs scored from an uncontested lineout.
Referee Craig Joubert is at the summit of his baffling occupation but even he seems to have been duped.
Boom Prinsloo caught the ball and transferred it back to teammate Heinrich Brussow as the Cheetahs formed a wedge around them.
The Chiefs did not challenge and fanned out while captain Liam Messam darted around to try to find the pill.
Meanwhile Brussow returned the ball to an offside Prinsloo who turned and ran to the tryline.
We've had innovations like 13-man lineouts and up the jumper mischief from tap penalties.
Referees have become stricter on decoy moves where defenders are blocked from their work and this latest Cheetahs version should be unlawful.
Hello, Sanzar? Anyone home? Peters and Bray, are you there, can you help, can you take the constituents through the logic of this rugby law.
